Romank v. Achtem et al., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1757 (SC)
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Barrow, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | FAMILY LAW,PRACTICE,CONTRACTS |
| Citation | [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1757 (SC),2009 BCSC 1757,[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1757 |
| Date | 21 December 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Kawana v. Shemal, 2011 BCSC 377
...Harrison v. Guest (1855) 6 De GM & G 424, at 438, affirmed (1860) 8 HL Cas 481, at 492, 493, 11 ER 517. [170] In Romank v. Achtem , 2009 BCSC 1757 at para. 15, the court held that: [15] It is settled law that a consent order, being the formal expression of an underlying agreement reache......
-
Constantini v. Constantini,
...for the claimant relies on the following statement of law as set out at para. 15 of the decision of this court in Romank v. Achtem, 2009 BCSC 1757: [15] It is settled law that a consent order, being the formal expression of an underlying agreement reached between the......
2 cases
-
Kawana v. Shemal, 2011 BCSC 377
...Harrison v. Guest (1855) 6 De GM & G 424, at 438, affirmed (1860) 8 HL Cas 481, at 492, 493, 11 ER 517. [170] In Romank v. Achtem , 2009 BCSC 1757 at para. 15, the court held that: [15] It is settled law that a consent order, being the formal expression of an underlying agreement reache......
-
Constantini v. Constantini,
...for the claimant relies on the following statement of law as set out at para. 15 of the decision of this court in Romank v. Achtem, 2009 BCSC 1757: [15] It is settled law that a consent order, being the formal expression of an underlying agreement reached between the......