Royal Trust v. Potash, [1986] 2 SCR 351
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Dickson, Robert George Brian; Chouinard, Julien; Wilson, Bertha; Le Dain, Gerald Eric; La Forest, Gérard V. |
| Date | 09 October 1986 |
| Citation | [1986] 2 SCR 351,[1986] RDI 725,1986 CanLII 34 (SCC),41 RPR 197,69 NR 286,44 Man R (2d) 30,34 BLR 167,[1986] 6 WWR 550,31 DLR (4th) 321 |
| Docket Number | 18820 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
28 practice notes
-
R. v. Jacob (G.), (1996) 95 O.A.C. 241 (CA)
...xvi (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 42]. R. v. Arnold, [1993] O.J. No. 471 (Prov. Div.), refd to. [para. 43]. Royal Trust Co. v. Potash, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 351; 69 N.R. 286; 44 Man.R.(2d) 30; 31 D.L.R.(4th) 321, refd to. [para. 61, footnote 1]. R. v. Hicklin (1868), L.R. 3 Q.B. 360, refd to. [para. ......
-
Bank of Montreal v. Li, 2020 FCA 22
...no statutory equivalent to the anti-waiver provision at subsection 168(1) of the Code. [46] For example, in Potash v. Royal Trust Co., [1986] 2 S.C.R. 351, 69 N.R. 286, the Supreme Court held that a mortgagor could elect not to exercise its statutory right to prepay a mortgage with a term o......
-
Solar Power Network Inc. v. ClearFlow Energy Finance Corp., 2018 ONCA 727
...be contrary to common sense, commercial reality and established principles of statutory interpretation. In Potash v. Royal Trust Co., [1986] 2 S.C.R. 351, at p. 368, the Supreme Court held that the Interest Act should, where the language of the Act permits, prefer an interpretation that “is......
-
Reid v. Scotland (Secretary of State) et al., (1998) 234 N.R. 30 (HL)
...Mental Welfare Commission are required to order a discharge. In s. 33(4) where an appeal is made to the sheriff by a patient under ss. 26, 30 or 34 of the Act , the sheriff is required to order a discharge if he is satisfied on either of the same two considerations. [55] It is in the contex......
Request a trial to view additional results
27 cases
-
R. v. Jacob (G.), (1996) 95 O.A.C. 241 (CA)
...xvi (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 42]. R. v. Arnold, [1993] O.J. No. 471 (Prov. Div.), refd to. [para. 43]. Royal Trust Co. v. Potash, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 351; 69 N.R. 286; 44 Man.R.(2d) 30; 31 D.L.R.(4th) 321, refd to. [para. 61, footnote 1]. R. v. Hicklin (1868), L.R. 3 Q.B. 360, refd to. [para. ......
-
Bank of Montreal v. Li, 2020 FCA 22
...no statutory equivalent to the anti-waiver provision at subsection 168(1) of the Code. [46] For example, in Potash v. Royal Trust Co., [1986] 2 S.C.R. 351, 69 N.R. 286, the Supreme Court held that a mortgagor could elect not to exercise its statutory right to prepay a mortgage with a term o......
-
Solar Power Network Inc. v. ClearFlow Energy Finance Corp., 2018 ONCA 727
...be contrary to common sense, commercial reality and established principles of statutory interpretation. In Potash v. Royal Trust Co., [1986] 2 S.C.R. 351, at p. 368, the Supreme Court held that the Interest Act should, where the language of the Act permits, prefer an interpretation that “is......
-
Reid v. Scotland (Secretary of State) et al., (1998) 234 N.R. 30 (HL)
...Mental Welfare Commission are required to order a discharge. In s. 33(4) where an appeal is made to the sheriff by a patient under ss. 26, 30 or 34 of the Act , the sheriff is required to order a discharge if he is satisfied on either of the same two considerations. [55] It is in the contex......
Request a trial to view additional results