Sabourin and Sun Group of Companies v. Laiken,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, C.J.C., Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver, Karakatsanis and Wagner, JJ.
Citation[2015] N.R. TBEd. AP.012,2015 SCC 17,382 DLR (4th) 577,[2015] SCJ No 17 (QL),66 CPC (7th) 1,[2015] 2 SCR 79,470 NR 89,[2015] CarswellOnt 5237,332 OAC 142,251 ACWS (3d) 242,JE 2015-660,[2015] ACS no 17
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date16 April 2015

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
545 practice notes
  • Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 15, 2017
    ...disobey the Court’s lawful orders or who otherwise display contempt for its process. [421] The Supreme Court of Canada in Carey v Laiken, 2015 SCC 17 at paras 33 to 35, 382 DLR (4th) 577, clarified that for civil contempt to be made out where an order is breached, three criteria must be met......
  • John Howard Society of Saskatchewan v. Saskatchewan (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 14, 2025
    ...Group Inc., [1991] 3 S.C.R. 154; R. v. Brown, 2022 SCC 18, [2022] 1 S.C.R. 374; R. v. Gardiner, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 368; Carey v. Laiken, 2015 SCC 17, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 79; Vidéotron Ltée v. Industries Microlec Produits Électroniques Inc., [1992] 2 S.C.R. 1065; Frank v. Canada (Attorney General),......
  • Morasse v. Nadeau‑Dubois,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 27, 2016
    ...Goudreault v. Collège de Rosemont, 2012 QCCS 2017; Caron v. Paul Albert Chevrolet Buick Cadillac inc., 2016 QCCA 564; Carey v. Laiken, 2015 SCC 17, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 79; Centre commercial Les Rivières ltée v. Jean bleu inc., 2012 QCCA 1663; Vidéotron Ltée v. Industries Microlec Produits Élect......
  • John Howard Society of Saskatchewan v Saskatchewan (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 14, 2025
    ...Inc., [1991] 3 S.C.R. 154 ; R. v. Brown, 2022 SCC 18 , [2022] 1 S.C.R. 374 ; R. v. Gardiner, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 368 ; Carey v. Laiken, 2015 SCC 17, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 79 ; Vidéotron Ltée v. Industries Microlec Produits Électroniques Inc., [1992] 2 S.C.R. 1065 ; Frank v. Canada (Attorney Gen......
  • Get Started for Free
492 cases
  • Al-Ghamdi v Alberta, 2017 ABQB 684
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 15, 2017
    ...disobey the Court’s lawful orders or who otherwise display contempt for its process. [421] The Supreme Court of Canada in Carey v Laiken, 2015 SCC 17 at paras 33 to 35, 382 DLR (4th) 577, clarified that for civil contempt to be made out where an order is breached, three criteria must be met......
  • John Howard Society of Saskatchewan v. Saskatchewan (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 14, 2025
    ...Group Inc., [1991] 3 S.C.R. 154; R. v. Brown, 2022 SCC 18, [2022] 1 S.C.R. 374; R. v. Gardiner, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 368; Carey v. Laiken, 2015 SCC 17, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 79; Vidéotron Ltée v. Industries Microlec Produits Électroniques Inc., [1992] 2 S.C.R. 1065; Frank v. Canada (Attorney General),......
  • Morasse v. Nadeau‑Dubois,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 27, 2016
    ...Goudreault v. Collège de Rosemont, 2012 QCCS 2017; Caron v. Paul Albert Chevrolet Buick Cadillac inc., 2016 QCCA 564; Carey v. Laiken, 2015 SCC 17, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 79; Centre commercial Les Rivières ltée v. Jean bleu inc., 2012 QCCA 1663; Vidéotron Ltée v. Industries Microlec Produits Élect......
  • John Howard Society of Saskatchewan v Saskatchewan (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 14, 2025
    ...Inc., [1991] 3 S.C.R. 154 ; R. v. Brown, 2022 SCC 18 , [2022] 1 S.C.R. 374 ; R. v. Gardiner, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 368 ; Carey v. Laiken, 2015 SCC 17, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 79 ; Vidéotron Ltée v. Industries Microlec Produits Électroniques Inc., [1992] 2 S.C.R. 1065 ; Frank v. Canada (Attorney Gen......
  • Get Started for Free
22 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 21 ' 25)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 29, 2021
    ...v. Plante, 2021 ONCA 462 Keywords: Family Law, Custody and Access, Civil Procedure, Orders, Enforcement, Civil Contempt, Carey v. Laiken, 2015 SCC 17, Greenberg v. Nowack, 2016 ONCA 949, Chong v. Donnelly, 2019 ONCA 799, Valoris pour enfants et adultes de Prescott-Russell c.K.R., 2021 ONCA ......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 6 ' 10, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 20, 2023
    ...Buffone v. Sokil, 2023 ONCA 168 Keywords: Wills and Estates, Civil Procedure, Contempt, Appeals, Stay Pending Appeal, Carey v. Laiken, 2015 SCC 17, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 79, Belton v. Spencer, 2020 ONCA 623 Hill v. Cambridge (City), 2023 ONCA 164 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Vexatious Litigants, Ap......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 15 ' 19, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 22, 2021
    ...c. P.13, s. 50(3)(f), Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 1.02(1) & 60.11(1), Carey v. Laiken, 2015 SCC 17, United Nurses of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney General), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 901, Chiang (Re), 2009 ONCA 3, Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. C......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 6, 2022 ' June 10, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 15, 2022
    ...ONCA 455 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Appeals, Perfection, Extensions of Time, Orders, Injunctions, Enforcement, Contempt, Carey v. Laiken, 2015 SCC 17, Town of Caledon v. Darzi Holdings Ltd., 2021 ONSC 985, Practice Direction Concerning Civil Appeals at the Court of Appeal for Ontario, s. 17......
  • Get Started for Free
26 books & journal articles
  • Remedies Available Under Provincial and Territorial Legislation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...11, Woronowicz v. Conti, 2015 ONSC 5247 (CanLII), at para. 17, Godard v. Godard, 2015 ONCA 568 (CanLII), at para. 17, Carey v. Laiken, 2015 SCC 17 (CanLII), at para. 36, and most recently in Ruffolo v. David, 2019 ONCA 385 (CanLII), at para. The paramount consideration in [parenting time] c......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...67 CareVest Capital Inc v CB Developments 2000 Ltd, 2007 BCSC 1146 ..............400 Carey v Laiken, 2015 SCC 17 .....................................................................198, 603, 604, 605, 610, 611 Cargill Ltd v Makarenko, 2009 SKQB 235 ...............................................
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...as where the alleged contemnor has acted in good faith to take reasonable steps to comply with the relevant court order: Carey v. Laiken, 2015 SCC 17 (CanLII), [2015] 2 S.C.R. 79, at 33-35, 37. The trial judge’s reasons on the contempt issue are conclusory. He does not explain why he conclu......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2024
    • Invalid date
    ...BCJ No 2909 (SC).......................................................................................................617 Carey v Laiken, 2015 SCC 17.................................................................................................................. 529, 530 Carmichael v Carm......
  • Get Started for Free