Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd. et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 355
| Judge | Allan, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | March 09, 2012 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 355;2012 BCSC 355;[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 355 (SC) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd.,
...interests: see e.g., Arbutus Software Inc. v. ACL Services Ltd., 2012 BCSC 1834 at para. 19; Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd., 2012 BCSC 355 at para. [68] The judge continued using the “corporate divorce” phrase in his Oral Reasons to denote the June 2017 agreements to separate M&am......
-
Collins Barrow Vancouver v. Collins Barrow National Cooperative Inc., 2015 BCSC 510
...were included within the scope of what is now s. 227(2)(a) of the Business Corporations Act . Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd. , 2012 BCSC 355 addressed whether a remedy could be granted where oppressive conduct had ended. There was evidence of ongoing oppression and the court was s......
-
Aliperti v. Dhalla, 2012 BCSC 1466
...she purposely lied to the Court, which resulted in a long delay in the proceedings. [41] In Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd. , 2012 BCSC 355 at paras. 84-85, Allan J. said that it is "trite law that the rule that costs follow the event is subject to an exception that arises from a j......
-
Libfeld v. Libfeld,
...consequently should reflect the expected growth in the value of the business and its assets: Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd., 2012 BCSC 355, at para. 49; and Belman v. Belman (1995), 26 O.R. (3rd) 56 (Gen. Div.), at para. [302] Further, Sheldon and Jay rely ......
4 cases
-
M. McIsaac Family Holdings Ltd. v. Tolam Holdings Ltd.,
...interests: see e.g., Arbutus Software Inc. v. ACL Services Ltd., 2012 BCSC 1834 at para. 19; Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd., 2012 BCSC 355 at para. [68] The judge continued using the “corporate divorce” phrase in his Oral Reasons to denote the June 2017 agreements to separate M&am......
-
Collins Barrow Vancouver v. Collins Barrow National Cooperative Inc., 2015 BCSC 510
...were included within the scope of what is now s. 227(2)(a) of the Business Corporations Act . Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd. , 2012 BCSC 355 addressed whether a remedy could be granted where oppressive conduct had ended. There was evidence of ongoing oppression and the court was s......
-
Aliperti v. Dhalla, 2012 BCSC 1466
...she purposely lied to the Court, which resulted in a long delay in the proceedings. [41] In Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd. , 2012 BCSC 355 at paras. 84-85, Allan J. said that it is "trite law that the rule that costs follow the event is subject to an exception that arises from a j......
-
Libfeld v. Libfeld,
...consequently should reflect the expected growth in the value of the business and its assets: Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd., 2012 BCSC 355, at para. 49; and Belman v. Belman (1995), 26 O.R. (3rd) 56 (Gen. Div.), at para. [302] Further, Sheldon and Jay rely ......