Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd. et al.

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeAllan, J.
Citation[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1324 (SC),[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1324,2011 BCSC 1324
Date05 October 2011
Subject MatterEQUITY,FAMILY LAW,COMPANY LAW,TRUSTS

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
20 practice notes
  • Mayer v. Mayer
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 4, 2018
    ...circumstances, I consider it appropriate to adopt the approach taken by Madam Justice Allan in Sangha v Reliance Investment Group Ltd, 2011 BCSC 1324. There, Allan J. commented at para 196 that because the stakes were so large and the animosities so deep, “none of the parties had the slight......
  • Norman, Re
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada)
    • August 2, 2019
    ...H.F. Clarke Ltd. v. Thermidaire Corp. (1973), 33 D.L.R. (3d) 13, 9 C.P.R. (2d) 203 (O.N.C.A.); Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd., 2011 BCSC 1324; Merklinger v. Merklinger (1992), 11 O.R. (3d) 233, 1992 CarswellOnt 304 (Ct. J. (G.D.)), aff’d 30 O.R. (3d) 575, 26 R.F.L. (4th) 7 (C.A.);......
  • Jacobs et al. v. Yehia et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 12, 2014
    ...consideration; and an intention to create legal relations: Red Burrito Ltd. at para. 25-27; Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd. , 2011 BCSC 1324 at para 526; Blue Line Hockey (BCSC) at paras. 36, 40. [225] The test for determining the intention to create legal relations is objective. I......
  • Miller Thomson LLP v. Sangha
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 13, 2022
    ...On October 5, 2011, Justice Allan issued reasons in Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd., 2011 BCSC 1324. That action (the “Reliance Action”) involved a share ownership dispute between Mr. Sangha and two brothers. Justice Allan made findings a)    Certain trust agreements......
  • Get Started for Free
17 cases
  • Norman, Re
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada)
    • August 2, 2019
    ...H.F. Clarke Ltd. v. Thermidaire Corp. (1973), 33 D.L.R. (3d) 13, 9 C.P.R. (2d) 203 (O.N.C.A.); Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd., 2011 BCSC 1324; Merklinger v. Merklinger (1992), 11 O.R. (3d) 233, 1992 CarswellOnt 304 (Ct. J. (G.D.)), aff’d 30 O.R. (3d) 575, 26 R.F.L. (4th) 7 ......
  • Mayer v. Mayer
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 4, 2018
    ...circumstances, I consider it appropriate to adopt the approach taken by Madam Justice Allan in Sangha v Reliance Investment Group Ltd, 2011 BCSC 1324. There, Allan J. commented at para 196 that because the stakes were so large and the animosities so deep, “none of the parties had the slight......
  • Jacobs et al. v. Yehia et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 12, 2014
    ...consideration; and an intention to create legal relations: Red Burrito Ltd. at para. 25-27; Sangha v. Reliance Investment Group Ltd. , 2011 BCSC 1324 at para 526; Blue Line Hockey (BCSC) at paras. 36, 40. [225] The test for determining the intention to create legal relations is objective. I......
  • Sangha v. Sangha
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 12, 2017
    ...delivered a lengthy and detailed judgment in the Oppression Action. Her reasons are indexed as Sangha v. Reliance Group Investment Ltd., 2011 BCSC 1324. Among other things, she found as follows:(a) At Gordy’s instigation, he and Mr. Sangha had conspired to defraud Ms. Sangha of her property......
  • Get Started for Free