Saugestad v. Saugestad, [2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. C49
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Russell, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | FAMILY LAW,TRUSTS |
| Citation | [2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. C49,2006 BCSC 1839 |
| Date | 13 December 2006 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 practice notes
-
Gibbons v. Livingston, 2018 BCCA 443
...prior to the testator’s death. See for example: Wong v. Soo, 2015 BCSC 1741 at paras. 70, 73‑75, 114‑115; Saugestad v. Saugestad, 2006 BCSC 1839 (varied but not on this point, 2008 BCCA 38); Glanville v. Glanville (1998), 58 B.C.L.R. (3d) 240, at paras. 14 and 50; Erlichman v. Erlichman Est......
-
Unger v. Unger Estate, 2017 BCSC 1946
...of other pre-death transactions undertaken by the testator.[See Wong v. Soo, 2015 BCSC 1741 at paras. 73-82; Saugestad v. Saugestad, 2006 BCSC 1839, varied on different grounds 2008 BCCA 38; Mawdsley v. Meshen, 2010 BCSC 1099, affirmed 2012 BCCA 91; Ciarniello v. James 2016 BCSC 1699][100] ......
-
Tindle v. Tindle, 2012 BCSC 604
...inheritance was not a family asset. In concluding this he referred, at para. 20, to the words of the court in Saugestad v. Saugestad , 2006 BCSC 1839, varied on other grounds 2008 BCCA 38: [94] In the case at bar, I cannot find that the discussions relating to planned expenditures amounted ......
-
McLean v. McLean, 2012 MBQB 206
...to create an express trust in circumstances such as these, the three requisite certainties must be present. In Saugestad v. Saugestad , 2006 BCSC 1839, the Court said the following at para. 82: The requirements for the creation of an express trust include the three certainties: the language......
Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
-
Gibbons v. Livingston, 2018 BCCA 443
...prior to the testator’s death. See for example: Wong v. Soo, 2015 BCSC 1741 at paras. 70, 73‑75, 114‑115; Saugestad v. Saugestad, 2006 BCSC 1839 (varied but not on this point, 2008 BCCA 38); Glanville v. Glanville (1998), 58 B.C.L.R. (3d) 240, at paras. 14 and 50; Erlichman v. Erlichman Est......
-
Unger v. Unger Estate, 2017 BCSC 1946
...of other pre-death transactions undertaken by the testator.[See Wong v. Soo, 2015 BCSC 1741 at paras. 73-82; Saugestad v. Saugestad, 2006 BCSC 1839, varied on different grounds 2008 BCCA 38; Mawdsley v. Meshen, 2010 BCSC 1099, affirmed 2012 BCCA 91; Ciarniello v. James 2016 BCSC 1699][100] ......
-
Tindle v. Tindle, 2012 BCSC 604
...inheritance was not a family asset. In concluding this he referred, at para. 20, to the words of the court in Saugestad v. Saugestad , 2006 BCSC 1839, varied on other grounds 2008 BCCA 38: [94] In the case at bar, I cannot find that the discussions relating to planned expenditures amounted ......
-
McLean v. McLean, 2012 MBQB 206
...to create an express trust in circumstances such as these, the three requisite certainties must be present. In Saugestad v. Saugestad , 2006 BCSC 1839, the Court said the following at para. 82: The requirements for the creation of an express trust include the three certainties: the language......
Request a trial to view additional results