Securities Regulation and the Constitutional Division of Powers

AuthorAnita Indira Anand
Pages102-114
102
 11
Securities Regulation and the
Constitutional Division of Powers
The Cop(s) in the Street
One of the recurring themes of this book is the fragmentary nature
of securities regulation in Canada. As discussed in Chapter 3, secur-
ities regulation has historically fallen within the legislative purview
of provincial governments. This has meant that, unlike the United
States and virtually all other developed countries, Canada does not
have a national securities regulatory authority. Instead, it has thir-
teen separate securities regulators one in every province and ter-
ritory. These bodies resemble each other, formulating policy and
adjudicating complaints, all in service of investor protection and
the integrity of the capital markets. They generally do the same
work, but each within the borders of its own provincial or territor-
ial jurisdiction.
The problem is that capital market activity does not lend itself
to neat divisions between provincial jurisdictions. Issuers of secur-
ities do not limit themselves to selling within select provinces, nor
do investors think along provincial lines when they decide how to
invest their money. There are many reasons why it is oen sug-
gested that Canadian investors would be better o under some sort
of national securities regulator. To begin, the current framework

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT