Sekerbank v Arslan, 2017 SKQB 205

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
Citation2017 SKQB 205
Docket NumberQBG 2314 of 2013
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Date21 July 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
18 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • 18 Noviembre 2023
    ...Seismotech Safety Systems Inc v Forootan, 2021 FC 773 ............................ 269–70 Şekerbank TAS v Arslan, 2017 SKQB 205, af’d on appeal, 2018 SKCA 77 .........................................................................................51, 157 Sekisui House Kabushiki Kaisha v Nag......
  • Interlocutory Injunctions: General Principles
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • 18 Noviembre 2023
    ...Ltd v Novopharm Ltd (1997), [1998] 2 FC 527 (TD); Hutchens v SCAM.COM , 2011 ONSC 56 at para 187. 100 See Şekerbank TAS v Arslan , 2017 SKQB 205 at para 40, af’d on appeal 2018 SKCA 77. The plaintif could provide an explanation for delay where it was waiting for the conclusion of ancillary ......
  • Digest: 2055190 Ontario Ltd. v Zhao, 2018 SKCA 66
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • 18 Agosto 2019
    ...24 RFL (5th) 159 Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corp. v Avramenko, 2014 SKQB 96, 436 Sask R 179, 34 CCLI (5th) 33 Sekerbank T.A.S. v Arslan, 2017 SKQB 205, 282 ACWS (3d) 497 Taylor v Heritage Roofing & Exteriors Inc., 2014 SKQB 85, 440 Sask R 261 Triple A Farms v State Agriculture Developm......
  • Digest: Coward v Kramer Ltd., 2018 SKCA 63
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • 18 Agosto 2019
    ...were estopped from relying on s. 46 because they had not invoked their right to void the contract within a reasonable time (see: 2017 SKQB 205). The appellants� grounds of appeal were that the trial judge erred in: 1) making his findings that, under s. 36(4), the test of whether an implemen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
  • 628356 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. v. WATER SECURITY AGENCY, 2018 SKQB 4
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 3 Enero 2018
    ...or misrepresentation identified by the statement of claim. The meaning of this requirement was summarized in Sekerbank T.A.S. v Arslan, 2017 SKQB 205, as follows: 21 … In Stomp Pork Farm Ltd. v. Lombard General Insurance Co. of Canada, 2008 SKQB 405, 316 Sask. R. 262 [Stomp Pork], Ottenbrei......
  • Recycling Worx Solutions Inc v Hunter,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 27 Enero 2023
    ...order: Dreco Energy Services Ltd v Wenzel, 2008 ABCA 290 at para 27 [Dreco Energy]; Simonelli at para 115; SEkerbank TAS v Arslan, 2017 SKQB 205 at paras 37-40, aff’d 2018 SKCA 77 at para 48; R v Gibbons, 2011 ONCJ 218 at para 39. In these cases, all the circumstances at the time of ......
  • Yorkton (City) v Mi-Sask Industries Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 19 Marzo 2021
    ...Court confirmed that security must be provided and that an undertaking does not meet that requirement. [96] In Şekerbank T.A.Ş. v Arslan, 2017 SKQB 205, the Court described the obligation on an applicant for a preservation order to address the issue of security as [55] First, I agree with t......
  • POLSFUT v. SEMBALERUS, 2018 SKQB 137
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 1 Mayo 2018
    ...against the defendant and against Schroeder’s, as required by case authority is present. See, for example: Sekerbank T.A.S. v Arslan, 2017 SKQB 205 at paras 19‑22. And see: Casbohm v Winacott Spring Western Star Trucks, 2018 SKQB 15 at paras [20] Before granting an order that Schroeder’s be......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Digest: 2055190 Ontario Ltd. v Zhao, 2018 SKCA 66
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • 18 Agosto 2019
    ...24 RFL (5th) 159 Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corp. v Avramenko, 2014 SKQB 96, 436 Sask R 179, 34 CCLI (5th) 33 Sekerbank T.A.S. v Arslan, 2017 SKQB 205, 282 ACWS (3d) 497 Taylor v Heritage Roofing & Exteriors Inc., 2014 SKQB 85, 440 Sask R 261 Triple A Farms v State Agriculture Developm......
  • Digest: Coward v Kramer Ltd., 2018 SKCA 63
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • 18 Agosto 2019
    ...were estopped from relying on s. 46 because they had not invoked their right to void the contract within a reasonable time (see: 2017 SKQB 205). The appellants� grounds of appeal were that the trial judge erred in: 1) making his findings that, under s. 36(4), the test of whether an implemen......
  • Digest: Polsfut v Sembalerus, 2018 SKQB 137
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • 1 Mayo 2018
    ...(1983), 144 DLR (3d) 636, [1983] 2 WWR 622, 22 Sask R 22 Josvanger v Folk, 2005 SKCA 138, 275 Sask R 101 Sekerbank T.A.S. v Arslan, 2017 SKQB 205, 282 ACWS (3d) 497 Stockbrugger Estate v Wolfe Estate, [1987] 4 WWR 759, 59 Sask R 96, 20 CPC (2d) 82 Manufacturing Ltd. v Canadian Imperial Bank......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT