Sga'Nisim Sim'Augit (Chief Mountain) et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1152
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | C.L. Smith, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE |
| Citation | [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1152,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1152 (SC),2012 BCSC 1152 |
| Date | 01 August 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Gagne et al. v. Sharpe et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 154
...litigation, but a private party defending its private interests. Rio Tinto relies on Chief Mountain v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 BCSC 1152, for the proposition that special considerations should inform a public interest costs award where private parties are involved. Rio Tinto cites p......
-
Sga'nisim Sim'augit (Chief Mountain) et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., 2013 BCCA 301
...judgment were delivered by the court on June 27, 2013. Introduction [1] By the Court : The appellants appeal from an order, indexed at 2012 BCSC 1152, requiring them to pay two-thirds of the costs on a party-party basis of the Nisga'a Nation resulting from the dismissal of their action chal......
-
Private Parties Not Liable For Public Interest Costs
...capacity to bear the costs of the proceeding was not a determinative factor. Relying on Chief Mountain v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 BCSC 1152, Rio Tinto submitted that as a private party defending its private interests, the burden on the petitioners was even higher than the already hi......
-
Private Parties Not Liable For Public Interest Costs
...capacity to bear the costs of the proceeding was not a determinative factor. Relying on Chief Mountain v. Canada (Attorney General ), 2012 BCSC 1152, Rio Tinto submitted that as a private party defending its private interests, the burden on the petitioners was even higher than the already h......
2 cases
-
Gagne et al. v. Sharpe et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 154
...litigation, but a private party defending its private interests. Rio Tinto relies on Chief Mountain v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 BCSC 1152, for the proposition that special considerations should inform a public interest costs award where private parties are involved. Rio Tinto cites p......
-
Sga'nisim Sim'augit (Chief Mountain) et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., 2013 BCCA 301
...judgment were delivered by the court on June 27, 2013. Introduction [1] By the Court : The appellants appeal from an order, indexed at 2012 BCSC 1152, requiring them to pay two-thirds of the costs on a party-party basis of the Nisga'a Nation resulting from the dismissal of their action chal......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Private Parties Not Liable For Public Interest Costs
...capacity to bear the costs of the proceeding was not a determinative factor. Relying on Chief Mountain v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 BCSC 1152, Rio Tinto submitted that as a private party defending its private interests, the burden on the petitioners was even higher than the already hi......
-
Private Parties Not Liable For Public Interest Costs
...capacity to bear the costs of the proceeding was not a determinative factor. Relying on Chief Mountain v. Canada (Attorney General ), 2012 BCSC 1152, Rio Tinto submitted that as a private party defending its private interests, the burden on the petitioners was even higher than the already h......