Sidhu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 133
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 27 January 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Muti v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1722
...overseas” when the ability to do so depended on the chance of the lottery system: Sidhu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 133 at paras 7–9. [22] In my view, it was not unreasonable in the context of this application for the officer to refer to the nature of avail......
-
Ram v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 210
...the normal manner. While this is not a necessary pre-condition for H&C relief (see Sidhu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 133 at paras 12-13), it does explain why there was a different outcome in Gonzalo. [24] The applicant submitted to the officer that the eq......
-
Khan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 202
...the Applicant to remain in Canada for longer stays. Relying on this Court’s decision in Sidhu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 133 [Sidhu], the Applicant argues that it was unreasonable for the Officer to make this statement. [12] In my view, the Officer’s statement in this c......
3 cases
-
Muti v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1722
...overseas” when the ability to do so depended on the chance of the lottery system: Sidhu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 133 at paras 7–9. [22] In my view, it was not unreasonable in the context of this application for the officer to refer to the nature of avail......
-
Ram v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 210
...the normal manner. While this is not a necessary pre-condition for H&C relief (see Sidhu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 133 at paras 12-13), it does explain why there was a different outcome in Gonzalo. [24] The applicant submitted to the officer that the eq......
-
Khan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 202
...the Applicant to remain in Canada for longer stays. Relying on this Court’s decision in Sidhu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 133 [Sidhu], the Applicant argues that it was unreasonable for the Officer to make this statement. [12] In my view, the Officer’s statement in this c......