Silver v. Imax

JurisdictionOntario
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
JudgeCorbett, J.
Neutral Citation2011 ONSC 1035
Citation[2011] O.T.C. Uned. 1035,[2011] O.T.C. Uned. 1035 (SC),2011 ONSC 1035,105 OR (3d) 212,80 BLR (4th) 228,[2011] OJ No 656 (QL),[2011] OTC Uned 1035 (SC),105 O.R. (3d) 212,[2011] O.J. No 656 (QL),[2011] OTC Uned 1035
Date14 February 2011
Subject MatterPRACTICE

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
81 practice notes
  • Palmer v. Teva Canada Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 12, 2022
    ...22 (SCJ). [117] Silver v. Imax Corp., [2009] O.J. No. 5585 at para. 103-107 (SCJ) at para. 103-107, leave to appeal to Div. Ct. refused 2011 ONSC 1035 (Div. Ct.); Boulanger v. Johnson & Johnson Corp., [2007] O.J. No. 179 at para. 22 (SCJ), leave to appeal ref’d [2007] O.J. No. 19......
  • Broutzas v. Rouge Valley Health System
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 25, 2018
    ...para. 21. [96] Silver v. Imax Corp., [2009] O.J. No. 5585 at para. 103-107 (S.C.J.) at para. 103-107, leave to appeal to Div. Ct. refused 2011 ONSC 1035 (Div. Ct.); Boulanger v. Johnson & Johnson Corp., [2007] O.J. No. 179 at para. 22 (S.C.J.), leave to appeal ref’d [2007] O.J. No. 1991......
  • Price v. H. Lundbeck A/S
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 16, 2018
    ...para. 21. [40] Silver v. Imax Corp., [2009] O.J. No. 5585 at para. 103-107 (S.C.J.) at para. 103-107, leave to appeal to Div. Ct. refused 2011 ONSC 1035 (Div. Ct.); Boulanger v. Johnson & Johnson Corp., [2007] O.J. No. 179 at para. 22 (S.C.J.), leave to appeal ref’d [2007] O.J. No. 1991......
  • Boal v. International Capital Management Inc.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 26, 2021
    ...para. 21. [72] Silver v. Imax Corp., [2009] O.J. No. 5585 at para. 103-107 (S.C.J.) at para. 103-107, leave to appeal to Div. Ct. refused 2011 ONSC 1035 (Div. Ct.); Boulanger v. Johnson & Johnson Corp., [2007] O.J. No. 179 at para. 22 (S.C.J.), leave to appeal ref’d [2007] O.J. No. 1991......
  • Get Started for Free
40 cases
  • Palmer v. Teva Canada Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 12, 2022
    ...22 (SCJ). [117] Silver v. Imax Corp., [2009] O.J. No. 5585 at para. 103-107 (SCJ) at para. 103-107, leave to appeal to Div. Ct. refused 2011 ONSC 1035 (Div. Ct.); Boulanger v. Johnson & Johnson Corp., [2007] O.J. No. 179 at para. 22 (SCJ), leave to appeal ref’d [2007] O.J. No. 19......
  • Broutzas v. Rouge Valley Health System
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 25, 2018
    ...para. 21. [96] Silver v. Imax Corp., [2009] O.J. No. 5585 at para. 103-107 (S.C.J.) at para. 103-107, leave to appeal to Div. Ct. refused 2011 ONSC 1035 (Div. Ct.); Boulanger v. Johnson & Johnson Corp., [2007] O.J. No. 179 at para. 22 (S.C.J.), leave to appeal ref’d [2007] O.J. No. 1991......
  • Price v. H. Lundbeck A/S
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 16, 2018
    ...para. 21. [40] Silver v. Imax Corp., [2009] O.J. No. 5585 at para. 103-107 (S.C.J.) at para. 103-107, leave to appeal to Div. Ct. refused 2011 ONSC 1035 (Div. Ct.); Boulanger v. Johnson & Johnson Corp., [2007] O.J. No. 179 at para. 22 (S.C.J.), leave to appeal ref’d [2007] O.J. No. 1991......
  • Boal v. International Capital Management Inc.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 26, 2021
    ...para. 21. [72] Silver v. Imax Corp., [2009] O.J. No. 5585 at para. 103-107 (S.C.J.) at para. 103-107, leave to appeal to Div. Ct. refused 2011 ONSC 1035 (Div. Ct.); Boulanger v. Johnson & Johnson Corp., [2007] O.J. No. 179 at para. 22 (S.C.J.), leave to appeal ref’d [2007] O.J. No. 1991......
  • Get Started for Free
8 firm's commentaries
  • The Second Opinion: U.S. Supreme Court To Reconsider Fraud-on-the-Market Theory
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 25, 2013
    ...Silver v. Imax Corp. (2009), 86 C.P.C. (6th) 273 (Ont. S.C.J.) at paras. 56-70 and 190, leave to appeal to Ont. Div. Ct. refused, 2011 ONSC 1035; Dobbie v. Arctic Glacier Income Fund, 2011 ONSC 25 at paras. 88-91, leave to appeal to Ont. Div. Ct. granted, 2012 ONSC 773; Dugal v. Manulife Fi......
  • Top 5 Civil Appeals from the Court of Appeal (March 2014)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 26, 2014
    ...219 A.C.W.S. (3d) 692, Silver v. IMAX Corp, [2009] O.J. No. 5573, 66 B.L.R. (4th) 222 (S.C.J.), leave to appeal to Ont. Div. Ct. refused, 2011 ONSC 1035, 105 O.R. (3d) 212, and Trustees of the Millwright Regional Council of Ontario Pension Trust Fund v. Celestica Inc., 2012 ONSC 6083, 113 O......
  • Halliburton: Deepening The Divide Between Certification Of US And Canadian Securities Class Actions
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 16, 2014
    ...some are now being allowed based on these principles, e.g., Mondor v Fisherman, 2001 CanLII 28388 (ONSC), Silver v Imax Corporation, 2011 ONSC 1035 (CanLII), Dobbie v Arctic Glacier Income Fund, 2011 ONSC 25 (CanLII) and Dugal v Manulife Financial Corporation, 2013 ONSC 4083 and 2014 ONSC 1......
  • Green v. CIBC: Recent Decision Gives Defendants To Securities Class Actions Cause For Optimism
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 12, 2012
    ...Ct. allowed in part, 2010 ONSC 4068 2 Silver v. IMAX Corp., (2009), 86 C.P.C. (6th) 273 (Ont. S.C.J.), lv. to appeal to Div. Ct. refused, 2011 ONSC 1035. 3 Dobbie v. Arctic Glacier Income Fund, 2011 ONSC 25, lv. to appeal to Div. Ct. allowed in part, 2012 ONSC Mark Gelowitz has a business-f......
  • Get Started for Free
33 books & journal articles
  • . . . and Yet So Far? the Utility of the Cy Près Doctrine in Class Proceedings Against the Crown
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 11-2, March 2016
    • March 1, 2016
    ...will and that they are bringing them in good faith; see Silver v IMAX, [2009] OJ No 5573 (SCJ), leave to appeal to Div Ct refused, 2011 ONSC 1035; Dobbie v Arctic Glacier Income Fund, 2011 ONSC 25 at paras 105–79 [Arctic Glacier], leave to appeal to Div Ct granted, 2012 ONSC 773; Andrea Lai......
  • A History of Class Actions: Modern Lessons From Deep Roots
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 7-1, October 2011
    • October 1, 2011
    ...By eliminating the hurdle posed 3 4 Silver v IMAX Corp (2009), 86 CPC (6th) 273 (Ont SCJ) [IMAX], leave to appeal to Div Ct refused, 2011 ONSC 1035 [IMAX–Leave]. McKenna v Gammon Gold Inc, 2010 ONSC 1591 [McKenna], leave to appeal to Div Ct allowed in part, 2010 ONSC 4068 [McKenna–Leave]. J......
  • The Use of Matrix Settlements in Canadian Class Actions
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 7-1, October 2011
    • October 1, 2011
    ...By eliminating the hurdle posed 3 4 Silver v IMAX Corp (2009), 86 CPC (6th) 273 (Ont SCJ) [IMAX], leave to appeal to Div Ct refused, 2011 ONSC 1035 [IMAX–Leave]. McKenna v Gammon Gold Inc, 2010 ONSC 1591 [McKenna], leave to appeal to Div Ct allowed in part, 2010 ONSC 4068 [McKenna–Leave]. J......
  • Palpable and Overriding Confusion: Appellate Review of Certification Orders in Canada
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 7-1, October 2011
    • October 1, 2011
    ...By eliminating the hurdle posed 3 4 Silver v IMAX Corp (2009), 86 CPC (6th) 273 (Ont SCJ) [IMAX], leave to appeal to Div Ct refused, 2011 ONSC 1035 [IMAX–Leave]. McKenna v Gammon Gold Inc, 2010 ONSC 1591 [McKenna], leave to appeal to Div Ct allowed in part, 2010 ONSC 4068 [McKenna–Leave]. J......
  • Get Started for Free