SJB v RDBB, 2020 ABCA 108

JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz,The Honourable Madam Justice Ritu Khullar,The Honourable Madam Justice Dawn Pentelechuk
Citation2020 ABCA 108
Docket Number1901-0279-AC
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date13 March 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Holmes v Holmes,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 4, 2023
    ...37; Athabasca at paras 64, 70 and 73; Peregrym v Peregrym, 2015 ABQB 176 at para 380; SJB v RDBB, 2019 ABQB 624 at para 108, affirmed by 2020 ABCA 108. [53]           Even if a matrimonial property claim was in place, the evidence is current......
  • Gunston v MacDonald,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 17, 2021
    ...relies on SJB v RDBB, 2019 ABQB 624, which decision was appealed on issues not related to the lump sum award, and upheld on appeal at 2020 ABCA 108. In SJB, Labrenz J articulated his reasons for making a lump sum award for prospective child support, and then relied on the same reasoning for......
  • ID v DB,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 9, 2022
    ...custody order, practically speaking, requires their cooperation...” (SJB v RDBB, 2019 ABQB 624 at para 35, aff’d 2020 ABCA 108). See also RG v KG, 2017 ONCA 108 where a Court determined that no one should have custody of a 17-year-old child who had effectively become independe......
  • Essa v APEGA,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 26, 2021
    ...evidence, be expected to have affected the result. [48] The onus rests on the applicant to establish the requisite criteria: SJB v RDBB, 2020 ABCA 108 at para [49] At issue here are the first and fourth factors in Palmer. [50] The respondent says the fresh evidence sought to be admitted by ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Holmes v Holmes,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 4, 2023
    ...37; Athabasca at paras 64, 70 and 73; Peregrym v Peregrym, 2015 ABQB 176 at para 380; SJB v RDBB, 2019 ABQB 624 at para 108, affirmed by 2020 ABCA 108. [53]           Even if a matrimonial property claim was in place, the evidence is current......
  • Gunston v MacDonald,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 17, 2021
    ...relies on SJB v RDBB, 2019 ABQB 624, which decision was appealed on issues not related to the lump sum award, and upheld on appeal at 2020 ABCA 108. In SJB, Labrenz J articulated his reasons for making a lump sum award for prospective child support, and then relied on the same reasoning for......
  • ID v DB,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 9, 2022
    ...custody order, practically speaking, requires their cooperation...” (SJB v RDBB, 2019 ABQB 624 at para 35, aff’d 2020 ABCA 108). See also RG v KG, 2017 ONCA 108 where a Court determined that no one should have custody of a 17-year-old child who had effectively become independe......
  • Essa v APEGA,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 26, 2021
    ...evidence, be expected to have affected the result. [48] The onus rests on the applicant to establish the requisite criteria: SJB v RDBB, 2020 ABCA 108 at para [49] At issue here are the first and fourth factors in Palmer. [50] The respondent says the fresh evidence sought to be admitted by ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT