SJF v DMK, 2018 ABQB 559
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Robert A. Graesser |
| Citation | 2018 ABQB 559 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 25 July 2018 |
| Docket Number | 4801 144084 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Child Support on or After Divorce
...a child support claim involving imputed income, see Locke v Bramwell, 2016 NSSC 300 at paras 8–18. 586 2017 ABCA 4; see also SJF v DMK, 2018 ABQB 559; Ruffell v Ruffell, 2021 ABCA Canadian family law income for child support, the onus of proving that the expenses are reasonable is clearly o......
-
Child Support on or after Divorce
...a child support claim involving imputed income, see Locke v Bramwell, 2016 NSSC 300 at paras 8–18. 552 2017 ABCA 4; see also SJF v DMK, 2018 ABQB 559. 507 508 Canadian family • When a self-employed parent argues that his or her gross income should be reduced by business expenses for purpose......
-
Determination of income; disclosure of income
...also Delichte v Rogers, 2018 MBQB 75 at paras 136–37, Little J; Yovcheva v Hristov, 2019 ONSC 1007. 127 2017 ABCA 4; see also SJF v DMK , 2018 ABQB 559. 128 Quoted by Williams J in Sawma v Zeidan, 2018 ONSC 4319 at para 29. 129 Cunningham v Seveny, 2017 ABCA 4 at para 28; see also Zdyb v Zd......
-
Table of cases
...v Sirdevan, 2010 ONSC 2375, [2009] OJ No 3796 ......................................................... 313, 321, 389–90 SJF v DMK, 2018 ABQB 559 .............................................................................................................................. 133, 203 SJP v CAP......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Werenka v Werenka, 2021 ABQB 1023
...in true "enforcement" scenarios, see Trevors v Lachance, 2018 ABQB 442 (E. Wilson J.) (paras 1-11), SJF v DMK, 2018 ABQB 559 (Graesser J.) (paras 8, and 89-97), and Park v Park, 2016 ABQB 603 (Shelley J.) (paras No other reason for solicitor-client costs here [......
-
MAK v TJK, 2019 ABQB 547
...are not otherwise available: Sweezey, at para 41. [93] The shareholder spouse is not required to provide expert evidence: SJF v DMK, 2018 ABQB 559 at paras 31 and 42. Courts must be mindful of increased litigation costs involved in hiring experts and providing detailed documentation and exp......
-
Smith v Gulka, 2020 ABQB 32
...inconsistent application of the three year rule as explained above. [109] For example, in SJF v DMK, 2018 ABQB 559 at paras 74-75, the Court held that the three year rule continues to [74] DMK argues that retroactive adjustme......
-
Spiess v Spiess,
...child in each household. [paras 47 and 48] [emphasis added] [8] In SJF v DMK, 2018 ABQB 559, Graesser J. considered (and rejected) a request to treat one parent’s income as effectively including that of his or her new No cas......
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...v Sirdevan, 2010 ONSC 2375, [2009] OJ No 3796 ......................................................... 313, 321, 389–90 SJF v DMK, 2018 ABQB 559 .............................................................................................................................. 133, 203 SJP v CAP......
-
Determination of income; disclosure of income
...also Delichte v Rogers, 2018 MBQB 75 at paras 136–37, Little J; Yovcheva v Hristov, 2019 ONSC 1007. 127 2017 ABCA 4; see also SJF v DMK , 2018 ABQB 559. 128 Quoted by Williams J in Sawma v Zeidan, 2018 ONSC 4319 at para 29. 129 Cunningham v Seveny, 2017 ABCA 4 at para 28; see also Zdyb v Zd......
-
Child Support on or After Divorce
...a child support claim involving imputed income, see Locke v Bramwell, 2016 NSSC 300 at paras 8–18. 586 2017 ABCA 4; see also SJF v DMK, 2018 ABQB 559; Ruffell v Ruffell, 2021 ABCA Canadian family law income for child support, the onus of proving that the expenses are reasonable is clearly o......
-
Child Support on or after Divorce
...a child support claim involving imputed income, see Locke v Bramwell, 2016 NSSC 300 at paras 8–18. 552 2017 ABCA 4; see also SJF v DMK, 2018 ABQB 559. 507 508 Canadian family • When a self-employed parent argues that his or her gross income should be reduced by business expenses for purpose......