MAK v TJK
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Susan L. Bercov |
| Citation | 2019 ABQB 547 |
| Date | 18 July 2019 |
| Docket Number | 4803 175492 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
ATCO Energy Solutions Ltd v. Energy Dynamics Ltd
...of a trial and the court’s decision. [61] An application to re-open a trial was made and granted before the decision in MAK v TJK, 2019 ABQB 547 at paras 14-18 and this was affirmed by the Court of Appeal MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196 [MAK CA] at paras 11-13. [62] I find that an application to r......
-
Bruno v Samson Cree Nation
...of the possible risk of incomplete argument and analysis, or oversight or potential error, avoiding a costly appeal); MAK v TJK, 2019 ABQB 547 at paras 12-20 (relating to re-open before decision, but in this case to allow further evidence; the test for new evidence and submissions at trial,......
-
MAK v TJK
...the manner in which their issues were resolved by the trial judge are reviewed in considerable detail in the reported reasons: MAK v TJK, 2019 ABQB 547. It is unnecessary to review that background [3] The appellant appeals the trial decision on four grounds: 1. the trial judge erred in reop......
-
VLG v WAJ
...Other Alberta cases on RESPs, all of which come to similar conclusions, include: Stalzer v Stalzer Estate, 2019 ABQB 658; MAK v TJK, 2019 ABQB 547; SSA v OB, 2017 ABQB Bentley v Bentley, 2017 ABQB 53; Omonova v Omonov, 2014 ABQB 660; KCF v AMF, 2011 ABQB 152; Widayanti v Rundle, 2018 ABQB 8......
4 cases
-
ATCO Energy Solutions Ltd v. Energy Dynamics Ltd
...of a trial and the court’s decision. [61] An application to re-open a trial was made and granted before the decision in MAK v TJK, 2019 ABQB 547 at paras 14-18 and this was affirmed by the Court of Appeal MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 196 [MAK CA] at paras 11-13. [62] I find that an application to r......
-
Bruno v Samson Cree Nation
...of the possible risk of incomplete argument and analysis, or oversight or potential error, avoiding a costly appeal); MAK v TJK, 2019 ABQB 547 at paras 12-20 (relating to re-open before decision, but in this case to allow further evidence; the test for new evidence and submissions at trial,......
-
MAK v TJK
...the manner in which their issues were resolved by the trial judge are reviewed in considerable detail in the reported reasons: MAK v TJK, 2019 ABQB 547. It is unnecessary to review that background [3] The appellant appeals the trial decision on four grounds: 1. the trial judge erred in reop......
-
VLG v WAJ
...Other Alberta cases on RESPs, all of which come to similar conclusions, include: Stalzer v Stalzer Estate, 2019 ABQB 658; MAK v TJK, 2019 ABQB 547; SSA v OB, 2017 ABQB Bentley v Bentley, 2017 ABQB 53; Omonova v Omonov, 2014 ABQB 660; KCF v AMF, 2011 ABQB 152; Widayanti v Rundle, 2018 ABQB 8......
