Sloan v. Ultramar Ltd. et al., [2011] O.A.C. Uned. 59 (CA)

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeArmstrong, Epstein and Karakatsanis, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Citation[2011] O.A.C. Uned. 59 (CA),[2011] O.A.C. Uned. 59,2011 ONCA 91
Date03 February 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 23-27)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 11 Octubre 2019
    ...Negligence, MedMal, Civil Procedure, Limitation Periods, Discoverability, Limitations Act, 2002, ss 4, 5(1), Sloan v. Ultramar Limited, 2011 ONCA 91, Pepper v. Zellers Inc. (2006), 83 OR (3d) 648 (CA), Lawless v. Anderson, 2011 ONCA 102, Brown v. Wahl, 2015 ONCA 778, Klein v. G4S Secure Sol......
  • Mancinelli v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2017 ONSC 7384
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 11 Diciembre 2017
    ...96 O.R. (3d) 481 (C.A.); Isofoton S.A. v. Toronto Dominion Bank, (2007), 85 O.R. (3d) 780 (S.C.J.).[31] Sloan v. Sauve Heating Ltd., 2011 ONCA 91 at para. 5 aff’g 2010 ONSC 3871.[32] 2013 ONSC 1477 and 2014 ONSC 2856.[33]Melville-Laborde v. 3455 Glen Erin Apartments Inc., 2017 ONSC 6004 (Ma......
  • Marcovitch v. Kertes et al., [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 1496
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 21 Junio 2011
    ...of Allen J. setting aside the decision of the Master that had granted leave to add a party, the Court of Appeal said at para. 5 of 2011 ONCA 91: While the threshold on a motion to add a party is low, it was not open to the Master on the available evidence to find that the plaintiff had prov......
  • Rumsam v. Pakes, 2019 ONCA 748
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 24 Septiembre 2019
    ...not when the plaintiff discovers potential liability; and b. erred in his application of the principle in Sloan v. Ultramar Limited, 2011 ONCA 91, 76 C.B.R. (5th) 153 that a plaintiff must exercise reasonable diligence to discover a claim after being advised of a “triggering FACTUAL BACKGRO......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • Mancinelli v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2017 ONSC 7384
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 11 Diciembre 2017
    ...96 O.R. (3d) 481 (C.A.); Isofoton S.A. v. Toronto Dominion Bank, (2007), 85 O.R. (3d) 780 (S.C.J.).[31] Sloan v. Sauve Heating Ltd., 2011 ONCA 91 at para. 5 aff’g 2010 ONSC 3871.[32] 2013 ONSC 1477 and 2014 ONSC 2856.[33]Melville-Laborde v. 3455 Glen Erin Apartments Inc., 2017 ONSC 6004 (Ma......
  • Marcovitch v. Kertes et al., [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 1496
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 21 Junio 2011
    ...of Allen J. setting aside the decision of the Master that had granted leave to add a party, the Court of Appeal said at para. 5 of 2011 ONCA 91: While the threshold on a motion to add a party is low, it was not open to the Master on the available evidence to find that the plaintiff had prov......
  • Rumsam v. Pakes, 2019 ONCA 748
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 24 Septiembre 2019
    ...not when the plaintiff discovers potential liability; and b. erred in his application of the principle in Sloan v. Ultramar Limited, 2011 ONCA 91, 76 C.B.R. (5th) 153 that a plaintiff must exercise reasonable diligence to discover a claim after being advised of a “triggering FACTUAL BACKGRO......
  • Thompson v. Mungham et al., 2013 ONSC 4994
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 26 Julio 2013
    ...(d) was leave to amend the pleading and add KOB sought within two years of the triggering event?. [27] In Sloan v, Sauve Heating Ltd ., 2011 ONCA 91, [2011] O.J. 402, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the threshold on a motion to add a party is low. This ruling upheld the decision of B.A. ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 23-27)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 11 Octubre 2019
    ...Negligence, MedMal, Civil Procedure, Limitation Periods, Discoverability, Limitations Act, 2002, ss 4, 5(1), Sloan v. Ultramar Limited, 2011 ONCA 91, Pepper v. Zellers Inc. (2006), 83 OR (3d) 648 (CA), Lawless v. Anderson, 2011 ONCA 102, Brown v. Wahl, 2015 ONCA 778, Klein v. G4S Secure Sol......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT