SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director)
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice C. Dario |
| Citation | 2019 ABQB 972 |
| Docket Number | FL01 28890; FL01 28887 |
| Date | 18 December 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
13 practice notes
-
Welter v Kequahtooway and El Mulla
...[36] This is similar to the finding of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in S.M. v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, 2019 ABQB 972 [S.M.]. In that matter, the First Nation appealed a Provincial Court judge’s decision not to grant intervenor status (U.R.M. (Re), 2018 ABPC 96......
-
SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director)
...referred to in this decision as the “QB Appeals” and are found at SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2019 ABQB 972 (the “Appeal Decision”). [4] The Guardians seek costs from each of SM and Siksika Nation jointly and severally for the various steps in this liti......
-
MB (Re)
...Prior to the Federal Act coming into force, in SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director) 2019 ABQB 972, Justice Dario noted that while both statutes include “best interests” provisions, these factors are not the only factors that courts must consider, and they do not ......
-
MU v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director)
...and decided upon. Reference was made to Dario, J’s decision in SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2019 ABQB 972 and the argument that participation could not broaden the legal issues before the Court. Specifically, the NCQ and the NCA would actually do what Da......
Get Started for Free
13 cases
-
Welter v Kequahtooway and El Mulla
...[36] This is similar to the finding of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in S.M. v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, 2019 ABQB 972 [S.M.]. In that matter, the First Nation appealed a Provincial Court judge’s decision not to grant intervenor status (U.R.M. (Re), 2018 ABPC 96......
-
SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director)
...referred to in this decision as the “QB Appeals” and are found at SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2019 ABQB 972 (the “Appeal Decision”). [4] The Guardians seek costs from each of SM and Siksika Nation jointly and severally for the various steps in this liti......
-
MB (Re)
...Prior to the Federal Act coming into force, in SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director) 2019 ABQB 972, Justice Dario noted that while both statutes include “best interests” provisions, these factors are not the only factors that courts must consider, and they do not ......
-
MM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director)
...implications. [14] The Orphan Wells analysis has been applied to intervener applications brought under the CYFEA (see SM v. Alberta, 2019 ABQB 972; RAB (Re) 178), though I find no reported decisions dealing with applications to intervene brought under s. 53.1 and so will review the statute ......
Get Started for Free
