SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director),
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice C. Dario |
| Citation | 2019 ABQB 972 |
| Date | 18 December 2019 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Docket Number | FL01 28890; FL01 28887 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
13 practice notes
-
Welter v Kequahtooway and El Mulla,
...This is similar to the finding of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in S.M. v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, 2019 ABQB 972 [S.M.]. In that matter, the First Nation appealed a Provincial Court judge’s decision not to grant intervenor status (U.R.M. (Re), 201......
-
Rebel News Network Ltd v Alberta (Election Commissioner), 2020 ABQB 687
...application of the Pedersen factors, see Dario J.’s decision in SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2019 ABQB 972 at paras [2] 2016 ABCA 238 at paras 10 (reproduction of Pedersen test), 11 and 13. [3] 2019 ABCA 385 (in chambers) at para 17 [4] 2019......
-
SL (Re), 2020 ABPC 194
...on this topic provides limited guidance to the case at bar. Both SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2019 ABQB 972 (SM) and Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director) v KC and JP, 2020 ABPC 62 (KC) refer to Indigenous governing bodies, bu......
-
MB (Re), 2022 ABPC 270
...Prior to the Federal Act coming into force, in SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director) 2019 ABQB 972, Justice Dario noted that while both statutes include “best interests” provisions, these factors are not the only factors that courts must consider, an......
Get Started for Free
13 cases
-
SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2020 ABQB 558
...referred to in this decision as the “QB Appeals” and are found at SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2019 ABQB 972 (the “Appeal Decision”). [4] The Guardians seek costs from each of SM and Siksika Nation jointly and severally for the various steps in this liti......
-
Welter v Kequahtooway and El Mulla,
...This is similar to the finding of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in S.M. v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, 2019 ABQB 972 [S.M.]. In that matter, the First Nation appealed a Provincial Court judge’s decision not to grant intervenor status (U.R.M. (Re), 201......
-
Rebel News Network Ltd v Alberta (Election Commissioner), 2020 ABQB 687
...application of the Pedersen factors, see Dario J.’s decision in SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2019 ABQB 972 at paras [2] 2016 ABCA 238 at paras 10 (reproduction of Pedersen test), 11 and 13. [3] 2019 ABCA 385 (in chambers) at para 17 [4] 2019......
-
MB (Re), 2022 ABPC 270
...Prior to the Federal Act coming into force, in SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director) 2019 ABQB 972, Justice Dario noted that while both statutes include “best interests” provisions, these factors are not the only factors that courts must consider, an......
Get Started for Free