SME internationalization research: Mapping the state of the art
Published date | 01 June 2018 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1419 |
Date | 01 June 2018 |
SME internationalization research: Mapping the
state of the art
Cláudia P. Ribau
University of Aveiro
António Carrizo Moreira*
University of Aveiro
Mário Raposo
University of Beira Interior
Abstract
This paper offers a review of published conceptual and
empirical studies indexed in the main academic search
databases, covering literature on the internationalization
of small and medium-sized firms. We analyzed a total of
554 papers covering the period between 1977 and 2014,
and found the following general trends: empirical research
focuses mainly on Europe and is characterized by a
diversity that identifies 74 different topics. This study
provides academics and practitioners with a clear perspec-
tive on future directions of SME internationalization and
contributes to our understanding of the relevant research
to date. Copyright © 2016 ASAC. Published by John Wiley
& Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: internationalization, SME, small firms, literature
review, internationalization topics
Résumé
Le présent article propose un tour d’horizon des études
empiriques et conceptuelles sur l’internationalisation des
petites et moyennes entreprises répertoriées dans les
principales bases de données de recherches scientifiques.
L’analyse de 554 articles publiés entre 1977 et 2014 met
en évidence les tendances suivantes : les études empiriques
portent surtout sur l’Europe et couvrent soixante-quatorze
sujets différents. L’étude propose aux chercheurs et aux
praticiens des pistes claires pour les recherches futures sur
l’internationalisation des PME en même temps qu’elle
permet de mieux cerner les recherches pertinentes
existantes. Copyright © 2016 ASAC. Published by John
Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Mots-clés : Internationalisation, PME, petite entreprise, re-
vue de la littérature, sujets sur l’internationalisation
The current trend of increasing integration and interrela-
tionships in the international economy has had a pervasive
influence on the internationalization of small and medium-
sized enterprises (SMEs). To date, although several studies
have analyzed the literature on SME internationalization, a
full understanding needs developing in several dimensions,
as this literature is of significant importance to companies
in the international economy and to academic research.
The study of internationalization, particularly of SMEs,
has been of increasing interest to the research community
(e.g., Etemad, 2004; Kuivalainen, Sundqvist, Saarenketo,
& McNaughton, 2012b; McAuley, 2010) because of the
relationship between SME competitiveness and increased
productivity, flexibility, and an active presence in the global
market. Although SME internationalization is a topic that
has already received special attention, it is still relatively
new. Traditionally, research has extensively focused on
large manufacturing firms, especially on the activities of
multinational enterprises (MNEs), by mainly applying the
transaction cost model, the eclectic paradigm, and the
monopolistic advantage theory (Dana, 2001; Etemad,
Wright, & Dana, 2001; McAuley, 2010; Wright & Dana,
2003). However, international markets are not only occupied
by MNEs but also by SMEs, which differ extensively in
terms of competences, market behaviour, and strategies
followed. SMEs have created new opportunities and shown
profitable growth (Lin & Chaney, 2007) while playing an
important role in the contemporary global marketplace
(Hessels & Parker, 2013; Javalgi, Todd, & Granot, 2011).
If in the literature on SME internationalization, a contrast
is drawn between the “traditional stages models”and
“new”phenomena, born globals (BGs), or international
new ventures (INVs) (D’Angelo, Majocchi, Zucchella, &
Buck, 2013), the articles most often examine firms and
ventures without specifying small or large firms.
*Please address correspondence to: António Moreira,University of Aveiro,
DEGEI, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal.
Email: amoreira@ua.pt
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
Revue canadienne des sciences de l’administration
35: 280–303 (2018)
Published online 25 November 2016 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.1419
Can J Adm Sci
35(2), 280–303 (2018)Copyright © 2016 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 280
Previous reviews have found that the theoretical and
methodological bases of SME internationalization
knowledge are growing but that the field is still fragmented.
While several researchers have attempted to put forward an
integrative view of SME internationalization (e.g., Graves
& Thomas, 2008; Mejri & Umemoto, 2010; Saarenketo,
Puumalainen, Kuivalainen, & Kyläheiko, 2004), none of
the models has been commonly accepted by the academic
community.
Although previous studies have covered several topics
within SME internationalization, the present study is unique
in its depth and length of coverage. McAuley (1999, 2010)
covered 20 years of research (1989–2009) but selects only
some of the relevant work published (i.e., 24 papers) on
SME internationalization, using a process view and failing
to cover internationalization from other angles. Leonidou
and Katsikeas (1996), Coviello and Martin (1999), Coviello
and Jones (2004), and Rialp, Rialp, and Knight (2005)
reviewed 10 years of research limited to early
internationalizing firms. Fillis (2001) analyzed 33 papers
on internationalization, covering the period 1975–2000,
without applying a clear criterion for firm size, which
therefore included MNEs in the study. Etemad (2004) and
Kuivalainen et al. (2012) presented an overview of the
conceptual frameworks and concepts relating to internation-
alization patterns of SMEs without including trends in the
empirical literature on this area of research. Kontinen and
Ojala (2010) focused on a review of the relevant research
on internationalization of family businesses, in which only
56% of the studies were based on SMEs.
The following authors stand out for their emphasis on
international entrepreneurship. Keupp and Gassmann
(2009) reviewed 179 papers published in 16 journals.
Although firm size was not considered or defined as a search
criterion in their study on international entrepreneurship,
their conclusions note that small, young firms have a propen-
sity to internationalize. Jones, Coviello, and Tang (2011)
reviewed 323 relevant articles, excluding SME international-
ization papers that do not incorporate elements of entrepre-
neurship. Peiris, Akoorie, and Sinha (2012) analyzed 291
papers but excluded papers focusing on SME internationali-
zation without entrepreneurial intervention and included
papers that mix SMEs with large firms. Kiss, Danis, and
Cavusgil (2012) analyzed 88 papers focusing on interna-
tional entrepreneurship in emerging economies. They
concluded that the research in emerging economies is still
quite limited and argue for a stronger theoretical grounding
and development, better contextual positioning, and greater
methodological rigor and sophistication.
Based on these reviews, the growing interest in interna-
tionalization and SMEs is obvious. However, one can also
conclude that several studies, while addressing international-
ization, do not focus specifically on how SMEs behave.
Rather, they focus on early internationalization, family busi-
ness, internationalizing firms, international entrepreneurship,
BGs, INVs, and so on, without an obvious criterion for firm
size that clearly separates SMEs from large firms. In this
context, we seek to fill this gap in reviews on the internation-
alization of SMEs. For this reason, we systematically
examine the literature on internationalization with the clear
objective of analyzing only SMEs, the relevant topics
studied, and the latter’s theoretical or empirical nature—
without any restrictions on time, journals, papers, or
researchers. Rather than restricting the search to journals
with the highest impact in their fields, we included all
published and accessible journal papers that fit the selection
criteria deployed. Based on these criteria, this literature
review offers a unique contribution.
Evaluations of SME internationalization processes
remain in high demand, with the following questions still
needing answers. How much SME internationalization
research has been published and in what kind of journals?
What are the main characteristics of SME internationaliza-
tion research? What is the current state of research and future
opportunities for scholars? To explore these issues, we
carried out an extensive literature review, seeking to provide
an overview of published work focusing on SME interna-
tionalization. In addition to addressing the above-mentioned
questions, this review also complements previous surveys of
SME internationalization research that did not apply a
systematic perspective. Through this in-depth look at SME
internationalization patterns, the present study helps identify
pathways, patterns, and trends, that provide insights into
how knowledge may be developed in the future and,
consequently, contributes to a better understanding of the
SME internationalization field.
We categorize, summarize, synthesize, and inte rpret re-
search on SME internationalization between 1977 and 2014.
To this end, we reviewed and evaluated 554 studies
published in international journals that, as a whole, can be
considered representative of the present knowledge on
SME internationalization. These papers were systematically
analyzed in an effort to clarify the current state of knowledge
about SME internationalization, focusing on the main topic
studied, type of paper and methodology, principal methodo-
logical procedures, and countries analyzed. We conclude
with a discussion of our findings, provide insights into the
most important and challenging areas for the research
community and practitioners, as well as offer a clearer
perspective on future developments within this topic.
SME Internationalization
The concept of SME internationalization is multifaceted,
and the definition of SME varies significantly across
countries. An SME in Europe is a firm that has fewer than
250 employees and a turnover not exceeding €50 million or
a balance sheet total not exceeding €43 million (European
Commission, 2014). However, in the US an SME can have
SME INTERNATIONALIZATION RESEARCH: MAPPINGTHE STATE OF THE ART RIBAU ET AL.
Can J Adm Sci
35(2), 280–303 (2018)Copyright © 2016 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 281
To continue reading
Request your trial