Table of Cases

AuthorKent Roach
ProfessionFaculty of Law and Centre of Criminology. University of Toronto
Pages469-497
469
TABLE OF CASES
A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separat ion), [2000]
4 All E.R. 961 (C.A.) .................................................................................... 313
Adgey v. R. (1973), [1975] 2 S.C.R. 426, 13 C.C.C. (2d) 177,
23 C.R.N.S. 298, 39 D.L.R. (3d) 553 ............................................................416
2 W.L.R. 968, 149 J.P. 433, 129 Sol. J. 362, 81 Cr. App. Rep. 166,
[1985] Crim. L.R. 503 (H.L .) ....................................................................... 126
Atlantic Sugar Re f‌ineries Co. v. Canada (A.G.), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 644,
12 B.L.R. 171, 535 C.P.R. (2d) 1, 32 N.R. 562 .............................................12 8
B.(N.) v. Hôtel-Dieu de Québec (1992), 69 C.C.C. (3d) 450, 86 D.L.R.
(4th) 385 (Que. S.C.) ....................................................................................311
2007 MBCA 40 .............................................................................................. 26
Beckford v. R. (1987), [1988] A.C. 130, [1987] 3 All E.R. 425, [1987]
3 W.L.R. 611, 131 Sol. J. 1122, [1988] Crim. L.R. 116 (P.C.) ......................304
Bedard v. Dawson, [1923] S.C.R. 681, 40 C.C.C. 404, [1923] S.C.J. No. 30......... 26
Bedder v. D.P.P., [1954] 2 All E.R. 801, [1954] 1 W.L.R. 1119,
98 Sol. J. 556 (H.L.) .....................................................................................362
Bell Expre ss Vu v. Canada, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559, 212 D.L.R. (4th) 1 ................... 82
Bhatnager v. Canada (Mi nister of Employment and Immigrat ion),
[1990] 2 S.C.R. 217 ...................................................................................... 210
Bratty v. A.G. for Northern Ireland (1961), [1963] A.C. 386, [1961]
3 All E.R. 523, [1961] 3 W.L.R. 965, 105 Sol. J. 865 (H.L.) .........................26 6
Brosseau v. R., [1969] S.C.R. 181, [1969] 3 C.C.C. 129, 5 C.R.N.S. 331,
2 D.L.R. (3d) 139, 65 W.W.R. 751 .................................................................416
CRIMIN AL LAW470
Canada (A.G.) v. Dupond, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 770, 84 D.L.R. (3d) 420,
[1978] S.C.J. No. 33 ........................................................................................ 26
Canada (Dire ctor of Investigation & Research, Combi nes Investigation
Branch) v. Southam Inc., [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145, 55 A.R. 291,
33 Alta. L.R. (2d) 193, 14 C.C.C. (3d) 97, 41 C.R. (3d) 97,
84 D.T.C. 6467, 2 C.P.R. (3d) 1, 9 C.R.R. 355, 55 N.R. 241 ..................... 34, 81
Canada v. Campbell (200 0), 35 C.R. (5th) 314, [2000] O.J. No. 2261
(S.C .J.) ..........................................................................................271, 282, 288
Canadia n Dredge & Dock Co. v. R., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 662, 19 C.C.C.
59 N.R. 241 ..................................................................... 202, 207, 211–12, 220
Canadia n Federation of Agr iculture v. Quebec (A.G.) (1950), [1951]
A.C. 179, [1950] 4 D.L.R. 689 (P.C.) .............................................................. 25
Canadia n Foundation for Child ren, Youth and the L aw v. Canada (A.G.),
2004 SCC 4 ..................................................6 0, 71, 85–86, 240, 254, 310, 445
Canadia nOxy Chemical v. Canada, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743, 133 C.C.C.
(3d) 426 .........................................................................................................82
Chow Bew v. The Queen (1955), [1956] S.C.R. 124, 113 C.C.C. 337,
[1955] S.C.J. No. 71 ...................................................................................... 138
Cloutier v. Langlois, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 158, 46 C.R.R. 37, 30 Q.A.C. 241 ..............34
Corp. professionnelle s des médecins (Québec) v. Thibault, [1988]
14 Q.A.C. 173, 84 N.R. 247 ............................................................................ 73
D.P.P. v. Beard, [1920] A.C. 479, [1920] All E.R. Rep. 21,
14 Cr. App. Rep. 159 (H.L.) ................................227–28, 240–41, 249–51, 269
[1978] 2 W.L.R. 679, 122 Sol. J. 280 (H.L.) .................................3 62, 363, 371
D.P.P. v. Morgan (1975), [1976] A.C. 182, [1975] 1 All E.R. 8 (H.L.) .................185
Dagenais v. Canadi an Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835,
175 N.R. 1, 76 O.A.C. 81 ................................................................................ 45
Dunbar v. R. (1936), 67 C.C.C. 20, [1936] 4 D.L.R. 737 (S.C.C.) ........145, 170, 333
(3d) 301, [1979] 4 W.W.R. 599, 27 N.R. 153..........................................138 –40
Fagan v. Metropolitan Police Commis sioner (1968), [1969] 1 Q.B. 439,
[1968] 3 All E.R. 442, [1968] 3 W.L.R. 1120, 112 Sol. J. 800 ..................... 100
Fain v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 78 Ky. Rptr. 183 (C.A. 1879) ..................282
Fowler v. Padget (1798), 101 E.R. 1103 (K.B.) ....................................................10 0
Frey v. Fedoruk, [1950] S.C.R. 517, 97 C.C.C. 1, 10 C.R. 26, [1950]
3 D.L.R. 513 ................................................................................................... 78

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT