Taherkhani v. Este,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice Giaschi
Citation2020 BCSC 101
Date28 January 2020
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberE131501
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 practice notes
  • Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCCA 226
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • July 31, 2020
    ...Groberman (In Chambers) On appeal from: Orders of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated January 28, 2020 (Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCSC 101, Vancouver Docket E-131501) and February 7, 2018 (Taherkhani v. Este, Vancouver Docket Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellants, Min......
  • 2024 BCSC 1226,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2024
    ...the Impugned Dispositions, her claim is satisfied by the creditor protection legislation. 229 More recently in Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCSC 101, this Court was also dealing with an application to strike the pleading. In dismissing the application Justice Giaschi noted the circumstances in ......
  • Bordignon v Bordignon,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 10, 2024
    ...the Impugned Dispositions, her claim is satisfied by the creditor protection legislation. 229 More recently in Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCSC 101, this Court was also dealing with an application to strike the pleading. In dismissing the application Justice Giaschi noted the circumstances in ......
  • Taherkhani v. Este, 2022 BCSC 372
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 9, 2022
    ...tunc basis? Background [5]            The relevant background facts are set in: 2020 BCSC 101 at paras. 5-29; 2021 BCSC 1339 , at paras. 3-29; and 2021 BCSC 1745 , at paras. 5-9. Briefly, the relevant facts are: a)    O......
  • Get Started for Free
10 cases
  • Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCCA 226
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • July 31, 2020
    ...Groberman (In Chambers) On appeal from: Orders of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated January 28, 2020 (Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCSC 101, Vancouver Docket E-131501) and February 7, 2018 (Taherkhani v. Este, Vancouver Docket Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellants, Min......
  • 2024 BCSC 1226,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2024
    ...the Impugned Dispositions, her claim is satisfied by the creditor protection legislation. 229 More recently in Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCSC 101, this Court was also dealing with an application to strike the pleading. In dismissing the application Justice Giaschi noted the circumstances in ......
  • Bordignon v Bordignon,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 10, 2024
    ...the Impugned Dispositions, her claim is satisfied by the creditor protection legislation. 229 More recently in Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCSC 101, this Court was also dealing with an application to strike the pleading. In dismissing the application Justice Giaschi noted the circumstances in ......
  • Taherkhani v. Este, 2022 BCSC 372
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 9, 2022
    ...tunc basis? Background [5]            The relevant background facts are set in: 2020 BCSC 101 at paras. 5-29; 2021 BCSC 1339 , at paras. 3-29; and 2021 BCSC 1745 , at paras. 5-9. Briefly, the relevant facts are: a)    O......
  • Get Started for Free