Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2020 ABQB 592
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Donald Lee |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 592 |
| Docket Number | 1803 05262 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 08 October 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company,
...Appeal from the Decision by The Honourable Justice D. Lee Dated the 8th day of October, 2020 Filed the 27th day of October 27, 2020 (2020 ABQB 592, Docket: 1803 Appeal from the Decision by The Honourable Justice D. Lee Dated the 26th day of March, 2021 ( 2021 ABQB 234 , Docket: 1803 05262) ......
-
Betser-Zilevitch v Prowse Chowne LLP,
...359. [36] While referring to the above law, both parties submitted that the recent decision in Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2020 ABQB 592 accurately sets out the standard of review of a review officer’s decision following Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov,......
-
Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co,
...Government of Canada (“Federal government”). The Court concluded that the CFA was unreasonable in a Decision reported at 2020 ABQB 592 issued in October 2020 (“First Decision”). Before the First Decision was issued, counsel were invited to deal, through supplemen......
-
Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co,
...The 20% contingency fee amounted to $11,518,075 (“$11.5 million”). [2] In my October 8, 2020 Memorandum of Decision now reported at 2020ABQB 592, I concluded that the RO made two reversible errors. The first error was when he applied the standard that the resulting fee of over $11.5 million......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company,
...Appeal from the Decision by The Honourable Justice D. Lee Dated the 8th day of October, 2020 Filed the 27th day of October 27, 2020 (2020 ABQB 592, Docket: 1803 Appeal from the Decision by The Honourable Justice D. Lee Dated the 26th day of March, 2021 ( 2021 ABQB 234 , Docket: 1803 05262) ......
-
Betser-Zilevitch v Prowse Chowne LLP,
...359. [36] While referring to the above law, both parties submitted that the recent decision in Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2020 ABQB 592 accurately sets out the standard of review of a review officer’s decision following Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov,......
-
Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co,
...The 20% contingency fee amounted to $11,518,075 (“$11.5 million”). [2] In my October 8, 2020 Memorandum of Decision now reported at 2020ABQB 592, I concluded that the RO made two reversible errors. The first error was when he applied the standard that the resulting fee of over $11.5 million......
-
Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co,
...Government of Canada (“Federal government”). The Court concluded that the CFA was unreasonable in a Decision reported at 2020 ABQB 592 issued in October 2020 (“First Decision”). Before the First Decision was issued, counsel were invited to deal, through supplemen......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Case Management Officers Critical Role In Court's Business
...to rule against a CMO's decision. Footnotes 1 Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2021 ABCA 360. 2 Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2020 ABQB 592. 3 Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2021 ABQB 234. 4 Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2021 ABQB 440 5 Alberta Rules of Court, AR 124/2010, r......
-
Case Management Officers Critical Role In Court's Business
...to rule against a CMO's decision. Footnotes 1 Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2021 ABCA 360. 2 Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2020 ABQB 592. 3 Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2021 ABQB 234. 4 Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2021 ABQB 440 5 Alberta Rules of Court, AR 124/2010, r......