Tang v. Duong, 2020 BCSC 85
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Thompson |
| Citation | 2020 BCSC 85 |
| Date | 04 February 2020 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | M173725 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Chevez-Babcock v. Peerens, 2020 BCSC 863
...damages for pain, suffering and loss of enjoyment of life were $59,426 in 2020 dollars. [106] Ms. Peerens also relies on Tang v. Duong, 2020 BCSC 85, but not specifically for the award for pain, suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. However, I find it to be helpful on this head of damage......
-
Bucholtz v. Zhang, 2020 BCSC 571
...that the appropriate range of non-pecuniary damages is $85,000 to $115,000. The plaintiff relies on the following cases: Tang v. Duong, 2020 BCSC 85 ($80,000); Harry v. Powar, 2018 BCSC 845 ($85,000); Lewis v. Wang, 2020 BCSC 16 ($90,000); Pasemko v. Kosolofski, 2020 BCSC 246 ($90,000); Gar......
-
Barre v. Dupasquie, 2020 BCSC 524
...an award of $90,000, based on the following authorities: Anderson v. Gagnon, 2018 BCSC 98 Duda v. Sekhon, 2015 BCSC 2393 Tang v. Duong, 2020 BCSC 85 [65] The defendant suggests a more modest award in the range of $45,000-$50,000, although that takes into account her failure to mitigate, whi......
-
Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135
...that when she was working full time, she was in constant pain. The case is not distinguishable on this basis. 97. In Tang v Duong, 2020 BCSC 85 the plaintiff was 52 years old at the time of trial. He worked in the financial services injuries and suffered soft tissue injuries to his neck and......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
Chevez-Babcock v. Peerens, 2020 BCSC 863
...damages for pain, suffering and loss of enjoyment of life were $59,426 in 2020 dollars. [106] Ms. Peerens also relies on Tang v. Duong, 2020 BCSC 85, but not specifically for the award for pain, suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. However, I find it to be helpful on this head of damage......
-
Bucholtz v. Zhang, 2020 BCSC 571
...that the appropriate range of non-pecuniary damages is $85,000 to $115,000. The plaintiff relies on the following cases: Tang v. Duong, 2020 BCSC 85 ($80,000); Harry v. Powar, 2018 BCSC 845 ($85,000); Lewis v. Wang, 2020 BCSC 16 ($90,000); Pasemko v. Kosolofski, 2020 BCSC 246 ($90,000); Gar......
-
Barre v. Dupasquie, 2020 BCSC 524
...an award of $90,000, based on the following authorities: Anderson v. Gagnon, 2018 BCSC 98 Duda v. Sekhon, 2015 BCSC 2393 Tang v. Duong, 2020 BCSC 85 [65] The defendant suggests a more modest award in the range of $45,000-$50,000, although that takes into account her failure to mitigate, whi......
-
Cox v. Acapulco, 2020 BCSC 1135
...that when she was working full time, she was in constant pain. The case is not distinguishable on this basis. 97. In Tang v Duong, 2020 BCSC 85 the plaintiff was 52 years old at the time of trial. He worked in the financial services injuries and suffered soft tissue injuries to his neck and......
Request a trial to view additional results