Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), [2013] N.R. TBEd. OC.006

Judgment Cited authorities 9 Cited in 19 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeLeBel, Fish, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver, Karakatsanis and Wagner, JJ.
Subject MatterEXPROPRIATION,INTEREST,ARBITRATION,PRACTICE
Citation[2013] N.R. TBEd. OC.006,2013 SCC 51
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date04 October 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • 18 Noviembre 2023
    ...183, 212 British Columbia (Forests) v Teal Cedar Products Ltd, 2013 SCC 51 ............... 678 British Columbia (Minister of Environment, Lands and Parks) v Alpha Manufacturing Inc, [1997] BCJ No 1989 (BCCA) ...................344–45 British Columbia (Minister of Forests) v Okanagan Indian ......
  • Equitable Compensation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • 18 Noviembre 2023
    ...RSBC 1996, c 79, s 2(c). 110 Morriss v British Columbia , 2007 BCCA 337 at para 36; British Columbia (Forests) v Teal Cedar Products Ltd , 2013 SCC 51 at para 40. Equit able Compensation 679 C. CONCLUSION The principles of equitable compensation remain in a state of lux in Canada. However, ......
  • Shannon v Shannon, 2023 ABCA 79
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 6 Marzo 2023
    ...Alberta Rules of Court, should not be read as “mere surplusage”: see British Columbia (Forests) v Teal Cedar Products Ltd, 2013 SCC 51 at para 28, [2013] 3 SCR 301; British Columbia v Philip Morris International Inc, 2018 SCC 36 at para 29, [2018] 2 SCR 595. As Gorsuch J (albe......
  • National Gypsum (Canada) Ltd. v. Canadian National Railway Co., (2014) 463 F.T.R. 193 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 5 Mayo 2014
    ...84]. Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), [2013] 3 S.C.R. 301; 449 N.R. 1; 343 B.C.A.C. 1; 586 W.A.C. 1; 2013 SCC 51, refd to. [para. 85]. Febles v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (2012), 442 N.R. 290; 357 D.L.R.(4th) 343; 2012 FCA 324, refd ......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
  • British Columbia (Forests) v. Teal Cedar Products Ltd., 2013 SCC 51
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 4 Octubre 2013
    ...763708785 681279405">3 cases SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Citation: British Columbia (Forests) v. Teal Cedar Products Ltd., 2013 SCC 51, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 301 Date: 20131004 Docket: 34769 Between: Her Majesty The Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Ministry ......
  • National Gypsum (Canada) Ltd. v. Canadian National Railway Co., (2014) 463 F.T.R. 193 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 5 Mayo 2014
    ...84]. Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), [2013] 3 S.C.R. 301; 449 N.R. 1; 343 B.C.A.C. 1; 586 W.A.C. 1; 2013 SCC 51, refd to. [para. 85]. Febles v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (2012), 442 N.R. 290; 357 D.L.R.(4th) 343; 2012 FCA 324, refd ......
  • Shannon v Shannon,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 6 Marzo 2023
    ...Alberta Rules of Court, should not be read as “mere surplusage”: see British Columbia (Forests) v Teal Cedar Products Ltd, 2013 SCC 51 at para 28, [2013] 3 SCR 301; British Columbia v Philip Morris International Inc, 2018 SCC 36 at para 29, [2018] 2 SCR 595. As Gorsuch J (albe......
  • Real Estate Council of Alberta v Moser,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 16 Febrero 2023
    ...No 35529). 9 Language should not be read as “mere surplusage”: see eg British Columbia (Forests) v Teal Cedar Products Ltd, 2013 SCC 51 at para 28, [2013] 3 SCR 301; British Columbia v Philip Morris International Inc, 2018 SCC 36 at para 29, [2018] 2 SCR 595. As Gorsuch J (alb......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • International Arbitration Comparative Guide
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 22 Febrero 2019
    ...arbitration acts generally empower arbitrators to award interest (British Columbia (Forests) v Teal Cedar Products Ltd, [2013] SCJ No 51, 2013 SCC 51 (SCC)). However, this power is limited to simple interest, unless legislation specifically provides the power to award compound interest (Tep......
  • This Week At The SCC (04/10/2013)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 9 Octubre 2013
    ...one decision this week of interest to Canadian businesses and professions. In British Columbia (Forests) v. Teal Cedar Products Ltd., 2013 SCC 51, the Court held that an arbitrator acting under the B.C. Commercial Arbitration Act ("CAA") cannot generally award either pre-judgment or post-ju......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT