The impact of sense of duty on brand community outcomes

Date01 December 2017
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1368
AuthorKatharina Goellner,Tanya Mark,Jennifer Alvarado
Published date01 December 2017
The impact of sense of duty on brand community
outcomes
Katharina Goellner
University of Guelph
Tanya Mark*
University of Guelph
Jennifer Alvarado
University of Guelph
Abstract
Research suggests that three markers are essential for a
successful brand community: a sense of belonging, rituals
and tradition, and a sense of duty toward the community.
The f‌irst two of these markers have been empirically vali-
dated; however, the third marker, sense of duty, has yet to
be empirically investigated. From a marketing perspective,
this is important because there is a need to understand the
marketing levers that inf‌luence favourable behavioural out-
comes. We f‌ind that sense of duty is a decisive mediator of
brand community behaviours and social identity. In addition,
we f‌ind that sense of duty is a multidimensional construct
consisting of three distinct components:new member integra-
tion, mentorship, and member retention. C opyright © 2016
ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: brand community, sense of duty, community
markers, brand management
Résumé
Daprès la rec herche, troi s marqueur s sont indi spens-
ablesausuccèsdune communauté de marque: le sens
de lappartenance, les rituels et les traditions et le sens
du devoir envers la communauté. De ces trois marqueurs,
seuls les deux premiers ont déjà été empiriquement validés.
Cette étude porte sur la validation empirique du troisième
marqueur. Du point de vue du marketing, ce marqueur est
dautant plus important quil importe de cerner les leviers de
marketing qui inf‌luencent les résultats comportementaux
favorables. Létude montre que le sens du devoir est non
seulement un médiateur déterminant des comportements de
communautédemarqueetdelidentité sociale, mais aussi un
construit multidimensionnel comprenant trois composantes
distinctes à savoir : lintégration des nouveaux membres, le
mentorat et la rétention des membres. Copyright © 2016
ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Mots-clés : communauté de marque, sens du devoir,
marqueurs communautaires, gestions des marques
Brand-loyal consumers are important to companies for
many reasons. These loyal consumers enhance a brands
marketing efforts by endorsing the brand to their network
of contacts. This in turn creates higher brand recognition that
may translate into new sales. Additionally, strong brands are
also less likely to be delisted from stores or dropped by dis-
tributors. And, unlike paid spokespeople, loyal consumers
are usually intrinsically motivated to promote the brand.
Consumers who have an aff‌inity toward a brand want to
share their experiences with like-minded individuals. Compa-
nies can benef‌it by building long-term relationshipswith con-
sumers and fostering their interactions by supporting brand
communities. A brand community is def‌ined as a specialized
non-geographically bound community, based on a structured
set of social relationships among admirers of a brand(Muniz
&OGuinn, 2001, p. 412). The relationship structure is com-
monly described in the brand community literature as a triad
model that consists of three components: consumer, brand,
and other consumers (Muniz & OGuinn, 2001). Fournier,
Sele, and Schögel (2005) argued that brand communities not
only enable a company to build and maintain relationships
with its consumers, but also provide a company with a com-
petitive advantage. Advances in technology, high internet
adoption rates,and social media have contributed to removing
barriers of geographically dispersed consumer bases and
enabling brand communities to thrive.
Companies however, are not the only ones that can gain
from the advantages of brand communities. From a consumers
*Please address correspondence to: Tanya Mark, Associate Professor of
Marketing, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario,
Canada, N1G 2W1. Email: markt@uoguelph.ca
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
Revue canadienne des sciences de ladministration
34: 416428 (2017)
Published online 15 February 2016 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.1368
Can J Adm Sci
34(4), 416428 (2017)Copyright © 2016 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 416

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT