Toor v 1176520 Alberta Ltd, 2019 ABCA 334

JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Michelle Crighton,The Honourable Madam Justice Jolaine Antonio,The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan
Citation2019 ABCA 334
Docket Number1803-0199-AC
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date13 September 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Stromberg v Olafson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • June 2, 2023
    ...Court considered the standard of review in the context of oppression cases and adopted the reasoning from Toor v 1176520 Alberta Ltd., 2019 ABCA 334, specifically in relation to discretionary decision-making. In Toor, the Alberta Court of Appeal wrote as follows: [24] This Court should not ......
  • Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 2, 2021
    ...unfair prejudice or unfair disregarding has occurred”: McGovern-Burke v Martineau, 2016 ABQB 514 at para 56; Toor v 1176520 Alberta Ltd., 2019 ABCA 334 at para [523] To identify the reasonable expectations of the shareholder, the Court should consider: “general commercial practice; the natu......
  • Okotoks Square Inc v Cora Franchise Group Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 8, 2022
    ...BCE Inc. v 1976 Debentureholders, [2008] 3 SCR 560. The nature of oppressive conduct was summarized in Toor v 1176520 Alberta Ltd, 2019 ABCA 334 at para [28]     “Oppression” describes conduct that is coercive, abusive, or in bad faith. “Unfair preju......
  • Chinook Park-Kelvin Grove-Eagle Ridge Community Association v Minor Hockey Association of Calgary,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 14, 2021
    ...v Noble, 1987 ABCA 84 (ABCA) at para 19, 78 AR 131 [Noble]. [199]     Subsequently, in Toor v 1176520 Alberta Ltd, 2019 ABCA 334, the Court “Oppression” describes conduct that is coercive, abusive, or in bad faith. “Unfair prejudice” denotes a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Stromberg v Olafson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • June 2, 2023
    ...Court considered the standard of review in the context of oppression cases and adopted the reasoning from Toor v 1176520 Alberta Ltd., 2019 ABCA 334, specifically in relation to discretionary decision-making. In Toor, the Alberta Court of Appeal wrote as follows: [24] This Court should not ......
  • Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 2, 2021
    ...unfair prejudice or unfair disregarding has occurred”: McGovern-Burke v Martineau, 2016 ABQB 514 at para 56; Toor v 1176520 Alberta Ltd., 2019 ABCA 334 at para [523] To identify the reasonable expectations of the shareholder, the Court should consider: “general commercial practice; the natu......
  • Okotoks Square Inc v Cora Franchise Group Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 8, 2022
    ...BCE Inc. v 1976 Debentureholders, [2008] 3 SCR 560. The nature of oppressive conduct was summarized in Toor v 1176520 Alberta Ltd, 2019 ABCA 334 at para [28]     “Oppression” describes conduct that is coercive, abusive, or in bad faith. “Unfair preju......
  • Chinook Park-Kelvin Grove-Eagle Ridge Community Association v Minor Hockey Association of Calgary,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 14, 2021
    ...v Noble, 1987 ABCA 84 (ABCA) at para 19, 78 AR 131 [Noble]. [199]     Subsequently, in Toor v 1176520 Alberta Ltd, 2019 ABCA 334, the Court “Oppression” describes conduct that is coercive, abusive, or in bad faith. “Unfair prejudice” denotes a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT