Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v. Ostrom, 2018 NSSC 177
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Judge | Honourable Justice Ann E. Smith |
| Citation | 2018 NSSC 177 |
| Date | 20 July 2018 |
| Court | Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | Hfx No. 430257 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
H&N Enterprise Inc. v. Novacation Inc., 2020 NSSC 303
...the relative risks of harm to the parties from granting or withholding interlocutory relief. [32] Tri-mac Holdings Inc. v. Olstrom, 2018 NSSC 177, dealt with an interim injunction application in an oppression action. I find the summary of the law as set out by the court to be helpful and Go......
-
MacDonald v. D’Aubin, 2019 NSSC 389
...pursuant to Section 116 of the Act; (n) an order requiring the trial of any issue. [103] In Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v. Ostrom, 2018 NSSC 177, Justice Ann Smith observed that: 22. … once a court makes a finding of oppressive conduct, it must still determine the appropriate remedy. "In doing so......
-
Gershkovich et al. v. Sapozhnik et al., 2019 MBQB 115
...applicant had established a strong prima facie case. [18] In Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v. Ostrom, 2018 NSSC 177, the Court echoed some of the above-referenced comments from Olszewski and Merks. The applicants sought a variety of items of interim r......
-
Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v. Ostrom, 2019 NSSC 44
...relief in an oppression proceeding. That motion was dismissed for the reasons this Court set out in Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v. Ostrom 2018 NSSC 177. The Defendants are seeking the costs of that motion, payable [2] The general rule is that costs follow the event. That rule is not absolute. The......
4 cases
-
H&N Enterprise Inc. v. Novacation Inc., 2020 NSSC 303
...the relative risks of harm to the parties from granting or withholding interlocutory relief. [32] Tri-mac Holdings Inc. v. Olstrom, 2018 NSSC 177, dealt with an interim injunction application in an oppression action. I find the summary of the law as set out by the court to be helpful and Go......
-
MacDonald v. D’Aubin, 2019 NSSC 389
...pursuant to Section 116 of the Act; (n) an order requiring the trial of any issue. [103] In Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v. Ostrom, 2018 NSSC 177, Justice Ann Smith observed that: 22. … once a court makes a finding of oppressive conduct, it must still determine the appropriate remedy. "In doing so......
-
Gershkovich et al. v. Sapozhnik et al., 2019 MBQB 115
...applicant had established a strong prima facie case. [18] In Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v. Ostrom, 2018 NSSC 177, the Court echoed some of the above-referenced comments from Olszewski and Merks. The applicants sought a variety of items of interim r......
-
Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v. Ostrom, 2019 NSSC 44
...relief in an oppression proceeding. That motion was dismissed for the reasons this Court set out in Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v. Ostrom 2018 NSSC 177. The Defendants are seeking the costs of that motion, payable [2] The general rule is that costs follow the event. That rule is not absolute. The......