Triple Holdings (BC) Inc. v. Kontzamanis, [2004] B.C.T.C. 394 (SC)

JudgeTruscott, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateMarch 17, 2004
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2004] B.C.T.C. 394 (SC);2004 BCSC 394

Triple Holdings Inc. v. Kontzamanis, [2004] B.C.T.C. 394 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2004] B.C.T.C. TBEd. MY.011

Triple Holdings (BC) Inc. (petitioner) v. Peter Kontzamanis and Georgia Kontzamanis (respondents)

(S84331; 2004 BCSC 394)

Indexed As: Triple Holdings (BC) Inc. v. Kontzamanis

British Columbia Supreme Court

New Westminster

Truscott, J.

March 25, 2004.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Landlord and Tenant - Topic 6683

Termination, forfeiture and reentry - Notice of termination - Form of - Requirements of - See paragraphs 1 to 19.

Landlord and Tenant - Topic 6784

Termination, forfeiture and reentry - Relief against forfeiture - For nonpayment of rent - See paragraphs 20 to 50.

Landlord and Tenant - Topic 6786

Termination, forfeiture and reentry - Relief against forfeiture - When available - See paragraphs 20 to 50.

Cases Noticed:

722924 Alberta Ltd. v. Sinn (2002), 309 A.R. 342 (Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 17].

Godfrey Estates Ltd. v. Cambridge (Ken) Ltd. (1974), 49 D.L.R.(3d) 337 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 22].

Jeans West Unisex Ltd. v. Hung et al. (1975), 60 D.L.R.(3d) 446 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 23].

Gleneagle Manor Ltd. et al. v. Finn's of Kerrisdale Ltd. et al. (1980), 116 D.L.R.(3d) 617 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 23].

Counsel:

J.S. Piamonte, for the petitioner;

C. Watson, for the respondents.

This application was heard on March 17, 2004, before Truscott, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on March 25, 2004.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 practice notes
  • Ahmed v. Alam, [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1922
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 5, 2011
    ...Ltd. , 2002 BCSC 1120; 677815 B.C. Ltd. v. Mega Wraps B.C. Restaurants et al , 2005 BCSC 503; and Triple Holdings v. Kontzamanis , 2004 BCSC 394. [24] In the latter case, Truscott J. held as follows at paras. 48 and 49: [48] I recognize that in cases where the landlord can be fully compensa......
  • Chamberlin v. Larson, 2011 SKPC 72
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • June 1, 2011
    ...by the tenant indicating that it no longer considers itself bound by the terms of the lease. ( Triple Holdings (BC) Inc. v. Kontzamanis , 2004 BCSC 394, para. 17. See also: 722924 Alberta Ltd. v. Sinn , 2002 ABPC 2, para. 10; 491506 B.C. Ltd. v. McElmoyle , 2004 Carswell BC 1837, para. 43.)......
  • Sechelt Golf & Country Club Ltd. v. Sechelt (District), [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1105
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 24, 2012
    ...of the tenant. Failure to pay rent as required is a repudiation of the agreement by the tenant: Triple Holdings v. Kontzamanis , 2004 BCSC 394 at para. 17. (e) although SGCC had made a conscious decision not to pay rent, at least during the timeframe when it was under the control of the Hal......
  • O'Malley's in the Beach Ltd. v. 2422 Queen Street Investments et al., [2009] O.T.C. Uned. Q40
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 27, 2009
    ...Marketing Inc. , [1995] O.J. No. 3730 (Gen.Div.), at paras. 70, 71 and 76. 2. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.7 3. See Triple Holdings v. Kontzamanis 2004 BCSC 394 (CanLII) (BCSC), at para. 13. [End of document] pan class="span1"> 1. Armenian Community Centre v. Morland Marketing Inc. , [1995] O.J. No.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Ahmed v. Alam, [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1922
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 5, 2011
    ...Ltd. , 2002 BCSC 1120; 677815 B.C. Ltd. v. Mega Wraps B.C. Restaurants et al , 2005 BCSC 503; and Triple Holdings v. Kontzamanis , 2004 BCSC 394. [24] In the latter case, Truscott J. held as follows at paras. 48 and 49: [48] I recognize that in cases where the landlord can be fully compensa......
  • Chamberlin v. Larson, 2011 SKPC 72
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • June 1, 2011
    ...by the tenant indicating that it no longer considers itself bound by the terms of the lease. ( Triple Holdings (BC) Inc. v. Kontzamanis , 2004 BCSC 394, para. 17. See also: 722924 Alberta Ltd. v. Sinn , 2002 ABPC 2, para. 10; 491506 B.C. Ltd. v. McElmoyle , 2004 Carswell BC 1837, para. 43.)......
  • Sechelt Golf & Country Club Ltd. v. Sechelt (District), [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1105
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 24, 2012
    ...of the tenant. Failure to pay rent as required is a repudiation of the agreement by the tenant: Triple Holdings v. Kontzamanis , 2004 BCSC 394 at para. 17. (e) although SGCC had made a conscious decision not to pay rent, at least during the timeframe when it was under the control of the Hal......
  • O'Malley's in the Beach Ltd. v. 2422 Queen Street Investments et al., [2009] O.T.C. Uned. Q40
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 27, 2009
    ...Marketing Inc. , [1995] O.J. No. 3730 (Gen.Div.), at paras. 70, 71 and 76. 2. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.7 3. See Triple Holdings v. Kontzamanis 2004 BCSC 394 (CanLII) (BCSC), at para. 13. [End of document] pan class="span1"> 1. Armenian Community Centre v. Morland Marketing Inc. , [1995] O.J. No.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT