United States v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 785
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Associate Chief Justice H. Holmes |
| Citation | 2020 BCSC 785 |
| Date | 27 May 2020 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 27761 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...443 United States v Meng, 2019 BCSC 2137 ......................................................................471 United States v Meng, 2020 BCSC 785 ............................................... 5, 325–27, 433, 446 United States v Muhammad ‘Isa, 2014 ABCA 256 .................................
-
Human Rights Considerations in Extradition
...v Fischbacher , 2009 SCC 46 [ Fischbacher ]. 33 hat argument was nonetheless eventually rejected. See United States of America v Meng , 2020 BCSC 785 [ Meng ]. 34 MM c Ministre de la Justice du Canada , 2019 QCCA 683, leave denied 2019 CanLII 96496. 433 Frédéric Mégret away with admissibili......
-
Introduction: Locating Transnational and Cross-Border Criminal Law
...does not have such sanctions. he extradition judge ruled that double criminality was nonetheless made out; see United States v Meng , 2020 BCSC 785. 9 Among other arguments, Meng’s defence team submitted that by asserting jurisdiction over an alleged defrauding of a UK bank, by a Chinese na......
-
United States v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 1607
...other evidence. [68] This submission cannot succeed because, as discussed in the ruling on double criminality (United States v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 785 at paras. 61, 80), the operation of US sanctions laws is part of the factual matrix underlying the alleged fraud. US sanctions laws explain why......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
-
United States v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 1607
...other evidence. [68] This submission cannot succeed because, as discussed in the ruling on double criminality (United States v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 785 at paras. 61, 80), the operation of US sanctions laws is part of the factual matrix underlying the alleged fraud. US sanctions laws explain why......
-
United States v. Meng, 2021 BCSC 440
...the offence of fraud, contrary to s. 380 of the Criminal Code of Canada. Those are outlined in previous reasons: United States v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 785 at paras. [7] I turn to the first of the three categories of evidence. 1. Evidence about statements made at the August 22, 2013 meeting [8] M......
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...443 United States v Meng, 2019 BCSC 2137 ......................................................................471 United States v Meng, 2020 BCSC 785 ............................................... 5, 325–27, 433, 446 United States v Muhammad ‘Isa, 2014 ABCA 256 .................................
-
Human Rights Considerations in Extradition
...v Fischbacher , 2009 SCC 46 [ Fischbacher ]. 33 hat argument was nonetheless eventually rejected. See United States of America v Meng , 2020 BCSC 785 [ Meng ]. 34 MM c Ministre de la Justice du Canada , 2019 QCCA 683, leave denied 2019 CanLII 96496. 433 Frédéric Mégret away with admissibili......
-
Introduction: Locating Transnational and Cross-Border Criminal Law
...does not have such sanctions. he extradition judge ruled that double criminality was nonetheless made out; see United States v Meng , 2020 BCSC 785. 9 Among other arguments, Meng’s defence team submitted that by asserting jurisdiction over an alleged defrauding of a UK bank, by a Chinese na......