Y. v. Swinemar, 2020 NSCA 56
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Judge | Van den Eynden, J.A. |
| Citation | 2020 NSCA 56 |
| Date | 04 September 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CA 499817 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Les impasses theoriques et pratiques du Controle de constitutionnalite canadien.
...70 [Renvoi mariage]; R c Laba, [1994] 3 RCS 965 aux pp 982-84, 120 DLR (4e) 175; Nielsen, supra note 159 aux para 15-16; Y v Swinemar, 2020 NSCA 56 au para 42 (tranchant un litige sur le critere de la mort raisonnablement previsible apres avoir note la declaration d'inconstitutionnalite au ......
-
R. v. Ankur,
...v. Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society, 2019 NSCA 45; Higgins v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2013 NSCA 118, and Y. v. Swinemar, 2020 NSCA 56. [47] In this case, I am not satisfied the appellants have demonstrated they have a reali......
-
Green v. Green,
...there exist exceptional circumstances that make it fit and just to grant a stay—the so-called secondary test. As noted in Y. v. Swinemar, 2020 NSCA 56: [15] … This latter branch of the test is akin to a safety valve, catching cases that warrant a stay but fall outside the primary three step......
-
3102602 Nova Scotia Limited v. Fraser,
...of Appeal does not prevent enforcement of the two orders here under appeal. As explained by Van den Eynden J.A. in Y. v. Swinemar, 2020 NSCA 56: [11] As noted, the filing of a Notice of Appeal does not operate as a stay of execution of the judgment being appeal......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R. v. Ankur,
...v. Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society, 2019 NSCA 45; Higgins v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2013 NSCA 118, and Y. v. Swinemar, 2020 NSCA 56. [47] In this case, I am not satisfied the appellants have demonstrated they have a reali......
-
Green v. Green,
...there exist exceptional circumstances that make it fit and just to grant a stay—the so-called secondary test. As noted in Y. v. Swinemar, 2020 NSCA 56: [15] … This latter branch of the test is akin to a safety valve, catching cases that warrant a stay but fall outside the primary three step......
-
3102602 Nova Scotia Limited v. Fraser,
...of Appeal does not prevent enforcement of the two orders here under appeal. As explained by Van den Eynden J.A. in Y. v. Swinemar, 2020 NSCA 56: [11] As noted, the filing of a Notice of Appeal does not operate as a stay of execution of the judgment being appeal......
-
327991 Nova Scotia Limited v. N2 Packaging Systems,
...Mootness as an issue in motions for a stay has been discussed in the context of both irreparable harm (see, e.g., Y. v. Swinemar, 2020 NSCA 56, at para. 17; Colpitts, at para. 50) and the balance of convenience (see, e.g., G.W. Holmes Trucking (1990) Ltd. (Re), 2005 NSCA 132, at para.......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Les impasses theoriques et pratiques du Controle de constitutionnalite canadien.
...70 [Renvoi mariage]; R c Laba, [1994] 3 RCS 965 aux pp 982-84, 120 DLR (4e) 175; Nielsen, supra note 159 aux para 15-16; Y v Swinemar, 2020 NSCA 56 au para 42 (tranchant un litige sur le critere de la mort raisonnablement previsible apres avoir note la declaration d'inconstitutionnalite au ......