Wilk v. Arbour, 2017 ONCA 21
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Weiler,Roberts,Rouleau |
| Citation | 2017 ONCA 21 |
| Docket Number | C61949 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Date | 13 January 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
19 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 18, 2022 ' July 22, 2022)
...(2d) 494 (Ont. H.C.), Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex, 2002 SCC 42, Interpretation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I-21, Wilk v. Arbour, 2017 ONCA 21, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, Hrushka v. Canada (Minister of Foreign Affairs), 2009 FC 69, 340 F.......
-
Table of cases
...442–43 Wilhelm v Hickson, [2000] 9 WWR 196, 199 Sask R 21 (CA) .........................200 Wilk v Arbour, [2017] OJ No 164, 2017 ONCA 21, 135 OR (3d) 708 ................ 104 Wilkinson v Downton, [1897] 2 QB 57, 76 LT 493 ....................................282, 283 Willers v Joyce, [2016]......
-
R v Baker,
...is not an invitation to ignore the text. As a result, this Court fundamentally disagrees with the position offered by Wilk v Arbour, 2017 ONCA 21 at para 20, 407 DLR (4th) 22 that at the end of the interpretive process, the court should then consider whether the proposed interpretation prod......
-
2023 ABCA 136,
...is not an invitation to ignore the text. As a result, this Court fundamentally disagrees with the position offered by Wilk v Arbour, 2017 ONCA 21 at para 20, 407 DLR (4th) 22 that at the end of the interpretive process, the court should then consider whether the proposed interpretation prod......
Get Started for Free
12 cases
-
R v Baker,
...is not an invitation to ignore the text. As a result, this Court fundamentally disagrees with the position offered by Wilk v Arbour, 2017 ONCA 21 at para 20, 407 DLR (4th) 22 that at the end of the interpretive process, the court should then consider whether the proposed interpretation prod......
-
2023 ABCA 136,
...is not an invitation to ignore the text. As a result, this Court fundamentally disagrees with the position offered by Wilk v Arbour, 2017 ONCA 21 at para 20, 407 DLR (4th) 22 that at the end of the interpretive process, the court should then consider whether the proposed interpretation prod......
-
R v Baker,
...is not an invitation to ignore the text. As a result, this Court fundamentally disagrees with the position offered by Wilk v Arbour, 2017 ONCA 21 at para 20, 407 DLR (4th) 22 that at the end of the interpretive process, the court should then consider whether the proposed interpretation prod......
-
Stefanyk v Sobeys Capital Incorporated, 2018 ABCA 125
...history of creating a risk of injury: Nasser v Rumford (1977), 7 AR 459 at paras. 22, 26, 5 Alta LR (2d) 84 (Alta SC, AD); Wilk v Arbour, 2017 ONCA 21 at para. 40, 135 OR (3d) 708; Whippey v Jones, [2009] EWCA Civ 452 at para. 19. It is not negligent to keep dogs in public, at least when th......
Get Started for Free
6 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 18, 2022 ' July 22, 2022)
...(2d) 494 (Ont. H.C.), Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex, 2002 SCC 42, Interpretation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I-21, Wilk v. Arbour, 2017 ONCA 21, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, Hrushka v. Canada (Minister of Foreign Affairs), 2009 FC 69, 340 F.......
-
Case Summary: Stefanyk v Sobeys Capital Incorporated
...of injury: Nasser v Rumford (1977), 1977 ALTASCAD 296 (CanLII), 7 AR 459 at paras. 22, 26, 5 Alta LR (2d) 84 (Alta SC, AD); Wilk v Arbour, 2017 ONCA 21 (CanLII) at para. 40, 135 OR (3d) 708; Whippey v Jones, [2009] EWCA Civ 452 at para. 19. It is not negligent to keep dogs in public, at lea......
-
Defence + Indemnity: April 2018 - II. Liability Issues C.
...AD); Wilk v Arbour, 2017 ONCA 21 (CanLII) at para. 40, 135 OR (3d) 708; Whippey v Jones, [2009] EWCA Civ 452 at para. 19. It is not negligent to keep dogs in public, at least when they are restrained or supervised. Further, dog owners can be expected to be responsible about their pets. Sobe......
-
Dog Walkers Beware!
...the walk occurs, irrespective of whether or not the dog walker was negligent or in any way responsible for the injury. Wilk v. Arbour, 2017 ONCA 21. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specif......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...442–43 Wilhelm v Hickson, [2000] 9 WWR 196, 199 Sask R 21 (CA) .........................200 Wilk v Arbour, [2017] OJ No 164, 2017 ONCA 21, 135 OR (3d) 708 ................ 104 Wilkinson v Downton, [1897] 2 QB 57, 76 LT 493 ....................................282, 283 Willers v Joyce, [2016]......