Wood Mountain Lakota First Nation No. 160 v Goodtrack, 2020 SKCA 10
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | Caldwell, Schwann and Tholl JJ.A. |
Citation | 2020 SKCA 10 |
Date | 31 January 2020 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
Docket Number | CACV3311 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 6-10 And 13-17, 2021)
...Kates v. Hall, 1991 CanLII 1127 (B.C.C.A.), aff'g [1989] B.C.J. No. 1358 (S.C.), Wood Mountain Lakota First Nation No. 160 v. Goodtrack, 2020 SKCA 10, at paras. 24-26, leave to appeal refused, [2020] S.C.C.A. No. 345, De Wurstemberger v. Royalite Oil Co., [1935] 2 D.L.R. 177 (Alta. S.C. (A.......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 6-10 And 13-17, 2021)
...Kates v. Hall, 1991 CanLII 1127 (B.C.C.A.), aff'g [1989] B.C.J. No. 1358 (S.C.), Wood Mountain Lakota First Nation No. 160 v. Goodtrack, 2020 SKCA 10, at paras. 24-26, leave to appeal refused, [2020] S.C.C.A. No. 345, De Wurstemberger v. Royalite Oil Co., [1935] 2 D.L.R. 177 (Alta. S.C. (A.......
-
HETHERINGTON v. SASKATCHEWAN LIQUOR AND GAMING AUTHORITY,
...put their “best foot forward” in the context of the application. See, for example: Wood Mountain Lakota First Nation No. 160 v Goodtrack, 2020 SKCA 10 at para [13] Here the parties wish to have this matter decided through the mechanism of the summary judgment procedure. The various affidavi......
-
Murphy v. Mullen,
...The appellants rely on a decision of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal – Wood Mountain Lakota First Nation No. 160 v. Goodtrack, 2020 SKCA 10, at paras. 24-26, leave to appeal refused, [2020] S.C.C.A. No. 345[3] – in support of their foreseeability argument. Notably, they do no......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
HETHERINGTON v. SASKATCHEWAN LIQUOR AND GAMING AUTHORITY,
...put their “best foot forward” in the context of the application. See, for example: Wood Mountain Lakota First Nation No. 160 v Goodtrack, 2020 SKCA 10 at para [13] Here the parties wish to have this matter decided through the mechanism of the summary judgment procedure. The various affidavi......
-
Murphy v. Mullen,
...The appellants rely on a decision of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal – Wood Mountain Lakota First Nation No. 160 v. Goodtrack, 2020 SKCA 10, at paras. 24-26, leave to appeal refused, [2020] S.C.C.A. No. 345[3] – in support of their foreseeability argument. Notably, they do no......
-
WOOD MOUNTAIN LAKOTA FIRST NATION NO. 160 v. GOODTRACK,
...On January 31, 2020, the Court of Appeal allowed Wood Mountain’s appeal in Wood Mountain Lakota First Nation No. 160 v Goodtrack, 2020 SKCA 10 [2020 Amended Judgment] increasing the damage award to $408,486.82 and awarding costs of $5,000. The 2020 Amended Judgment was registered aga......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 6-10 And 13-17, 2021)
...Kates v. Hall, 1991 CanLII 1127 (B.C.C.A.), aff'g [1989] B.C.J. No. 1358 (S.C.), Wood Mountain Lakota First Nation No. 160 v. Goodtrack, 2020 SKCA 10, at paras. 24-26, leave to appeal refused, [2020] S.C.C.A. No. 345, De Wurstemberger v. Royalite Oil Co., [1935] 2 D.L.R. 177 (Alta. S.C. (A.......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 6-10 And 13-17, 2021)
...Kates v. Hall, 1991 CanLII 1127 (B.C.C.A.), aff'g [1989] B.C.J. No. 1358 (S.C.), Wood Mountain Lakota First Nation No. 160 v. Goodtrack, 2020 SKCA 10, at paras. 24-26, leave to appeal refused, [2020] S.C.C.A. No. 345, De Wurstemberger v. Royalite Oil Co., [1935] 2 D.L.R. 177 (Alta. S.C. (A.......