Yue v. Bank of Montreal, 2020 FC 468
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 468 |
| Date | 01 April 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912
...within the proper jurisdiction of the Officer in the PRRA Application, she should have done so at that instance (Yue v Bank of Montreal, 2020 FC 468 at paras 48-49; see also Canada RNA Biochemical Inc v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 668 at para 92). The Applicant’s counsel at this judicial revie......
-
Waqas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 896
...not consider arguments raised at the 11th hour – in this case, at the hearing itself (see, for instance, Yue v Bank of Montreal, 2020 FC 468 at para 39). I will nonetheless consider the argument, and in so doing so, will reframe the questions the Court is being asked to answer as: Di......
-
Carrasqueiras v. Sunwing Airlines Inc., 2022 FC 1714
...one of which is whether the substance or essence of a complaint has been previously considered. [30] As held in Yue v Bank of Montreal, 2020 FC 468 at paragraph 24, with reference to Zulkoskey v Canada (Employment and Social Development), 2016 FCA 268 [Zulkoskey] at paras 17, 18, 23-24, “ve......
-
Yue v. Bank of Montreal,
...OF MONTREAL Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT RENNIE J.A. [1] The appellant appeals from the judgment of the Federal Court (per Diner J.) 2020 FC 468 dismissing the appellant's application for judicial review of the Canadian Human Rights Commission decision not to reactivate his human ri......
4 cases
-
Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912
...within the proper jurisdiction of the Officer in the PRRA Application, she should have done so at that instance (Yue v Bank of Montreal, 2020 FC 468 at paras 48-49; see also Canada RNA Biochemical Inc v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 668 at para 92). The Applicant’s counsel at this judicial revie......
-
Waqas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 896
...not consider arguments raised at the 11th hour – in this case, at the hearing itself (see, for instance, Yue v Bank of Montreal, 2020 FC 468 at para 39). I will nonetheless consider the argument, and in so doing so, will reframe the questions the Court is being asked to answer as: Di......
-
Carrasqueiras v. Sunwing Airlines Inc., 2022 FC 1714
...one of which is whether the substance or essence of a complaint has been previously considered. [30] As held in Yue v Bank of Montreal, 2020 FC 468 at paragraph 24, with reference to Zulkoskey v Canada (Employment and Social Development), 2016 FCA 268 [Zulkoskey] at paras 17, 18, 23-24, “ve......
-
Yue v. Bank of Montreal,
...OF MONTREAL Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT RENNIE J.A. [1] The appellant appeals from the judgment of the Federal Court (per Diner J.) 2020 FC 468 dismissing the appellant's application for judicial review of the Canadian Human Rights Commission decision not to reactivate his human ri......