Zuk v Alberta Dental Association and College, 2020 ABCA 162
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Brian O’Ferrall,The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz,The Honourable Madam Justice Dawn Pentelechuk |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 162 |
| Date | 29 April 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 1903-0079-AC |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Dhalla v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba,
...standard to decisions involving both penalty and costs. See, for example, Zuk v Alberta Dental Association and College, 2020 ABCA 162 at para 15; and Essa v APEGA, 2021 ABCA 116 at para 22. On other occasions, the question of penalty has been reviewed on the Housen standard of p......
-
Essa v APEGA,
...burden on the regulator and the professional, and the way the defence was conducted: Zuk v Alberta Dental Association and College, 2020 ABCA 162 at paras 15-16, leave to appeal refused, [2020] SCCA No 208 Application for the Admission of Fresh Evidence [23] We will first consider the appell......
-
Alsaadi v Alberta College of Pharmacy,
...judgment of the governing bodies, and they are therefore reviewed for reasonableness: Zuk v Alberta Dental Ass’n and College, 2020 ABCA 162 at para. 15. By analogy to the standard of review applied to sanctions generally, sanctions in professional misconduct cases should not be distu......
-
Virk v Law Society of Alberta,
...judgment of the governing bodies, and they are therefore reviewed for reasonableness: Zuk v Alberta Dental Ass’n and College, 2020 ABCA 162 at para. 15. By analogy to the standard of review applied to sanctions generally, sanctions in professional misconduct cases should not be distu......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
Dhalla v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba,
...standard to decisions involving both penalty and costs. See, for example, Zuk v Alberta Dental Association and College, 2020 ABCA 162 at para 15; and Essa v APEGA, 2021 ABCA 116 at para 22. On other occasions, the question of penalty has been reviewed on the Housen standard of p......
-
Essa v APEGA,
...burden on the regulator and the professional, and the way the defence was conducted: Zuk v Alberta Dental Association and College, 2020 ABCA 162 at paras 15-16, leave to appeal refused, [2020] SCCA No 208 Application for the Admission of Fresh Evidence [23] We will first consider the appell......
-
Alsaadi v Alberta College of Pharmacy,
...judgment of the governing bodies, and they are therefore reviewed for reasonableness: Zuk v Alberta Dental Ass’n and College, 2020 ABCA 162 at para. 15. By analogy to the standard of review applied to sanctions generally, sanctions in professional misconduct cases should not be distu......
-
Virk v Law Society of Alberta,
...judgment of the governing bodies, and they are therefore reviewed for reasonableness: Zuk v Alberta Dental Ass’n and College, 2020 ABCA 162 at para. 15. By analogy to the standard of review applied to sanctions generally, sanctions in professional misconduct cases should not be distu......
Request a trial to view additional results