AA v JA, 2017 ABQB 19

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice W.N. Renke
Citation2017 ABQB 19
Docket Number4803 165061
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date19 May 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • BRH v RPS, 2017 ABCA 268
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 16, 2017
    ...question of “Compared to what?” Some courts have resisted expressly presumptions: see eg the cases mentioned at para 18 of A(A) v A(J), 2017 ABQB 19, [2017] AJ No 535 (QL).[72] Nevertheless, where the evidence shows an established bond with one parent as compared to the other parent, the ev......
  • CAS v NPC, 2020 ABQB 421
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 21, 2020
    ...The initials in the citation and style of cause have changed from CAKS and NPAC to CAS and NPC. [1] 2017 ABQB 19 at para 18 [2] 2010 ABQB 711 (Tilleman J.) at para 29 [3] 2015 ABQB 551 (Veit J.) at para 33 [4] 2018 ABQB 1041 (Brooker J.) at para 20 [5] 2009 ABQB 556 (Veit J.) at para 37 [6]......
  • MAK v TJK, 2019 ABQB 547
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 18, 2019
    ...assessment of the child’s best interests. It is the child’s interests, not the parent’s interests that govern the mobility issue: AA v JA, 2017 ABQB 19 at para [31] No presumptions guide the assessment of the child’s best interests and both parties bear the evidential burden of assisting th......
  • MDS v DSM, 2020 ABQB 471
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 17, 2020
    ...v SLA, 2019 ABCA 492 at paras 20 and 26 (actual time spent with children not determinative). [5] 1995 CanLII 1840 (BCSC) at para 42 [6] 2017 ABQB 19 (Renke J.) at para 24 [7] 2020 ABCA 173 at para 13 [8] 2014 ABCA 165 [9] 2013 ABQB 552 at para 81. (Manderscheid J. denied an application by t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • BRH v RPS, 2017 ABCA 268
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 16, 2017
    ...question of “Compared to what?” Some courts have resisted expressly presumptions: see eg the cases mentioned at para 18 of A(A) v A(J), 2017 ABQB 19, [2017] AJ No 535 (QL).[72] Nevertheless, where the evidence shows an established bond with one parent as compared to the other parent, the ev......
  • CAS v NPC, 2020 ABQB 421
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 21, 2020
    ...The initials in the citation and style of cause have changed from CAKS and NPAC to CAS and NPC. [1] 2017 ABQB 19 at para 18 [2] 2010 ABQB 711 (Tilleman J.) at para 29 [3] 2015 ABQB 551 (Veit J.) at para 33 [4] 2018 ABQB 1041 (Brooker J.) at para 20 [5] 2009 ABQB 556 (Veit J.) at para 37 [6]......
  • MAK v TJK, 2019 ABQB 547
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 18, 2019
    ...assessment of the child’s best interests. It is the child’s interests, not the parent’s interests that govern the mobility issue: AA v JA, 2017 ABQB 19 at para [31] No presumptions guide the assessment of the child’s best interests and both parties bear the evidential burden of assisting th......
  • MDS v DSM, 2020 ABQB 471
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 17, 2020
    ...v SLA, 2019 ABCA 492 at paras 20 and 26 (actual time spent with children not determinative). [5] 1995 CanLII 1840 (BCSC) at para 42 [6] 2017 ABQB 19 (Renke J.) at para 24 [7] 2020 ABCA 173 at para 13 [8] 2014 ABCA 165 [9] 2013 ABQB 552 at para 81. (Manderscheid J. denied an application by t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT