Awashish v. Conseil des Atikamekw d’Opitciwan, 2019 FC 1131

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date03 September 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Monsanto v. Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 12, 2020
    ...Toronto (City) v A.G. Ontario, 2018 ONCA 761, at para 10); or a strong prima facie case (Awashish v. Conseil des Atikamekw d’Opitciwan, 2019 FC 1131 (Grammond, J.) at paras 18-20; Orpheus Medica v Deep Biologics Inc., 2020 ONSC 4974 (Papageorgiou, J), at para 17. In other recent cases, cour......
  • McCallum v. Canoe Lake Cree First Nation, 2022 FC 969
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 29, 2022
    ...solutions to legislative issues in keeping with their own laws and traditions (referencing Awashish v Conseil des Atikamekw d’Opitciwan, 2019 FC 1131 and Linklater v Thunderchild First Nation, 2020 FC 899 [Linklater]). The Respondents submit that any declaration of invalidity should be susp......
  • Linklater v. Thunderchild First Nation Government, 2020 FC 1065
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 25, 2020
    ...that an “election arbitrator” had the power to decide constitutional questions. See also Awashish v Conseil des Atikamekw d’Opitciwan, 2019 FC 1131 at paragraphs 41–42; McKenzie v Ambroise, 2020 FC 340. [35] In this case, the presumption is not rebutted. The Thunderchild Constitution is bas......
  • Bertrand v. Acho Dene Koe First Nation, 2021 FC 257
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 25, 2021
    ...a strong likelihood of prevailing at trial: RJR, at 339; CBC, at paragraph 7. In Awashish v Conseil des Atikamekw d’Opitciwan, 2019 FC 1131 at paragraphs 17-19, I held that this heightened test applies where a person whose candidacy was rejected seeks to have his name added to the ba......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Monsanto v. Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 12, 2020
    ...Toronto (City) v A.G. Ontario, 2018 ONCA 761, at para 10); or a strong prima facie case (Awashish v. Conseil des Atikamekw d’Opitciwan, 2019 FC 1131 (Grammond, J.) at paras 18-20; Orpheus Medica v Deep Biologics Inc., 2020 ONSC 4974 (Papageorgiou, J), at para 17. In other recent cases, cour......
  • McCallum v. Canoe Lake Cree First Nation, 2022 FC 969
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 29, 2022
    ...solutions to legislative issues in keeping with their own laws and traditions (referencing Awashish v Conseil des Atikamekw d’Opitciwan, 2019 FC 1131 and Linklater v Thunderchild First Nation, 2020 FC 899 [Linklater]). The Respondents submit that any declaration of invalidity should be susp......
  • Linklater v. Thunderchild First Nation Government, 2020 FC 1065
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 25, 2020
    ...that an “election arbitrator” had the power to decide constitutional questions. See also Awashish v Conseil des Atikamekw d’Opitciwan, 2019 FC 1131 at paragraphs 41–42; McKenzie v Ambroise, 2020 FC 340. [35] In this case, the presumption is not rebutted. The Thunderchild Constitution is bas......
  • Bertrand v. Acho Dene Koe First Nation, 2021 FC 257
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 25, 2021
    ...a strong likelihood of prevailing at trial: RJR, at 339; CBC, at paragraph 7. In Awashish v Conseil des Atikamekw d’Opitciwan, 2019 FC 1131 at paragraphs 17-19, I held that this heightened test applies where a person whose candidacy was rejected seeks to have his name added to the ba......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT