Cantin v. Petersen
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Bruce, J. |
| Citation | 2012 BCSC 549,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 549,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 549 (SC) |
| Date | 17 April 2012 |
| Subject Matter | DAMAGES,DAMAGE AWARDS |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
35 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...2007 CanLII 17024 (SCJ) aff’d 2008 ONCA 876 ..................................................................327, 357 Cantin v Petersen, 2012 BCSC 549 .................................................................... 156 Capital Pontiac Buick Cadillac GMC Ltd v Coppola, 2013 SKCA 80 .........
-
Compensation for Personal Injury
..., 2007 BCSC 671; Smith , above note 75. 99 [1911] 2 KB 786 (CA). 100 Morlan v Barrett , 2012 BCCA 66 at paras 57–60; Cantin v Petersen , 2012 BCSC 549 at paras 80–81. 101 Rowe , above note 74. 102 In Lowe v Guise , [2002] 3 All ER 454 (CA), the court held, on a preliminary motion, that a pl......
-
Rajan v. Hudon
...from properly mitigating where she fails to follow a recommendation for treatment for reasons beyond her control: Cantin v. Petersen , 2012 BCSC 549 at para. 109. The plaintiff's fear of re-injury flowed from the persistence of her chronic pain, and is a factor beyond her control. This is n......
-
Sirak v. Noonward et al.
...and the defendants, in my view, the most similar, in terms of the factors relevant to non-pecuniary damages, is Cantin v. Peterson , 2012 BCSC 549. In that case, non-pecuniary damages of $150,000 were awarded after a reduction to reflect the finding the plaintiff's physical condition would ......
Get Started for Free
32 cases
-
Rajan v. Hudon
...from properly mitigating where she fails to follow a recommendation for treatment for reasons beyond her control: Cantin v. Petersen , 2012 BCSC 549 at para. 109. The plaintiff's fear of re-injury flowed from the persistence of her chronic pain, and is a factor beyond her control. This is n......
-
Sirak v. Noonward et al.
...and the defendants, in my view, the most similar, in terms of the factors relevant to non-pecuniary damages, is Cantin v. Peterson , 2012 BCSC 549. In that case, non-pecuniary damages of $150,000 were awarded after a reduction to reflect the finding the plaintiff's physical condition would ......
-
Dennis v. Fothergill
...by the similar circumstances found in Felix v. Hearne , 2011 BCSC 1236; Zawadzki v. Calimoso , 2011 BCSC 45; Cantin v. Petersen , 2012 BCSC 549; Eccleston v. Dresen , 2009 BCSC 332; Williamson v. Suna , 2009 BCSC 576; and Shapiro v. Dailey , 2010 BCSC 770. [73] The defendant argues that whi......
-
Suri v. Thomasen
...involved plaintiffs who were not able to work (Sebaa v. Ricci, 2015 BCSC 1492, Marois v. Pelech, 2007 BCSC 1969, and Cantin v. Petersen, 2012 BCSC 549) or “had little hope for the future” (Pololos v. Cinnamon-Lopez, 2016 BCSC 81), neither of which reflect Ms. Suri’......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...2007 CanLII 17024 (SCJ) aff’d 2008 ONCA 876 ..................................................................327, 357 Cantin v Petersen, 2012 BCSC 549 .................................................................... 156 Capital Pontiac Buick Cadillac GMC Ltd v Coppola, 2013 SKCA 80 .........
-
Compensation for Personal Injury
..., 2007 BCSC 671; Smith , above note 75. 99 [1911] 2 KB 786 (CA). 100 Morlan v Barrett , 2012 BCCA 66 at paras 57–60; Cantin v Petersen , 2012 BCSC 549 at paras 80–81. 101 Rowe , above note 74. 102 In Lowe v Guise , [2002] 3 All ER 454 (CA), the court held, on a preliminary motion, that a pl......
