Character Evidence: Primary Materiality

AuthorDavid M. Paciocco/Lee Stuesser/Palma Paciocco
Pages63-134
63
CHAPTER 3
CHARACTER EVIDENCE:
PRIMARY MATERIALITY
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1) “Character Evidence” Introduced
“Character evidence” is any proof that is presented in order to establish
the personality, psychological state, attitude, or general capacity of an
individual to engage in particular behaviour. Whether the character
being proved is good or bad, this kind of evidence can lead to primar-
ily material inferences about how likely it is that someone behaved in
the fashion alleged, or to secondarily material inferences about how
trustworthy the evidence of a witness might be.1 Character evidence
can take a number of forms. Character can be proved directly through
statements of opinion (“In my view, Joan is dishonest.”) or by proof of
reputation (“Joan’s reputation in the community for honesty is good.”).
“Character” in its broader sense can even be proved through expert
opinion (“Simon is a sexual psychopath.”). Character can also be estab-
lished circumst antially — for example, by proving the part icular acts of
a person on other occasions. This can be done through the testimony
of witnesses to those events, through admissions by the person whose
character is being explored, through certificates proving that individ-
ual’s criminal convictions, or in other ways. This chapter discusses
the use of character evidence that is offered to help directly establish
1 Primar y and secondary mater iality are discu ssed in Chapter 2 at Section s 2.2
and 2.3.
THE LAW OF EVIDENCE64
the primarily material issue of what happened, rather than to show or
challenge the credibility of the accused or other persons as witnesses.
1.2) Character and Concerns About Relevance and
Prejudice
Where the character of a person is not a matter directly in issue in
a proceeding,2 there is often insecurity about the relevance and true
probative value of character evidence. This is because, by its very
nature, character evidence is general information about a person that
is being presented for the purpose of leading to specific conclusions
about behaviour on a particular occasion. Its probative value often
depends on the proposition that persons tend to act consistently with
their character. We know from human experience, however, that this
is only sometimes true. The fact that a person has a tendency to act a
particular way does not mean that they always act that way, nor does it
necessarily mean that they acted that way on the occasion in question.
Not only is the probative value of character evidence often uncer-
tain, but also the generalizations involved in character typing tend to
be pejorative and judgmental. The spectacle of attacking a person’s
character is therefore distasteful. More importantly, when character is
proved, it presents the risk of prejudice. The primary concern is with
“moral prejudice,” which in this context refers to the risk that individ-
uals will be judged based on their character or on stereotypes about
human conduct, rather than on the rat ional strength of all t he evidence.
“Reasoning prejudice” is also a concern a nd encompasses several h arms,
including distracting from the real issues, complicating the case and
thereby increasing the risk of confusion, and adding to the expense of
the litigation.3
1.3) Character and Mere Habit
Character evidence rules are concerned with drawing inferences based
on the kind of person the individual in question is. It is therefore
important in applying these rules to distinguish between “character”
and “habit.” A habit, being the regular tendency of a person to engage
repeatedly in a particular kind of conduct, can be evidence of how a
2 For example, “charact er” in a broad sense is direc tly in issue in proceedin gs
such as dangerou s offender applications, inquir ies into fitness to sta nd trial,
section 16 mental di sorder defences, and defamation s uits.
3 See Chapter 2, Sect ion 5.3, “The Concept of ‘Prejudice’.”
Character Ev idence: Primary Mat eriality65
person likely acted on the occasion in question4 without reflecting on
that person’s character. Where evidence of habit does not reflect on a
person’s character — such as the habit of smoking a particular brand of
cigarettes the rationales underlying the character evidence rules do
not apply, and the admission of evidence about that habit should turn
solely on its relevance and on the application of general exclusionary
considerations. Where, however, a habit can colour the impression held
by others of the kind of person the subject is, the character evidence
rules should determine admissibility. Character evidence rules should
therefore govern the admission of the accused person’s habit of, for
example, donating money or carrying a gun.
1.4) Character Rules Vary with Context
Because the intensity of the risk of prejudice varies depending on
whether the evidence is being presented in a criminal or a civil case,
and whether it relates to a party or a non-party, different character evi-
dence rules govern. In criminal cases, the rules also vary depending
on whether it is the accused or the Crown calling the evidence. In
both criminal and civil cases, the character evidence rules vary as
well, depending on whether the character evidence is being adduced
on a primarily material issue (that is, what happened) or a secondarily
material issue (that is, to challenge the credibility of a witness).5
It is important to appreciate that, if character evidence is admit-
ted as proof of what happened, and if the person whose character has
been proved also testifies, then the trier of fact will be free to use that
already-admitted character evidence in assessing that person’s cred-
ibility.6 Yet the converse is not true. Character ev idence admitted about
the credibility of the witness cannot be used to draw inferences about
what happened unless that evidence would also have been admissible
under the rules that govern that purpose. The reason is that the law
tends to be more restrictive w ith primarily material ch aracter evidence.
4 R v Vant, 2015 ONCA 481 at para 67 [Vant].
5 This chapter deal s solely with character ev idence that is presented a s being
primar ily material, in the se nse that it is being intr oduced as circumstant ial
evidence to as sist in determining wh at happened. For a discussion of se condar-
ily materi al character evidence, see C hapter 10, Section 5, “The Collateral Facts
Rule,” and Chapter 11, “Secondary M ateriality and Your Own Wit ness.”
6 In R v Dorfer,2010 BCCA 440 at paras 39– 40, aff’d [2011] 3 SCR 366 [Dorfer],
for example, the cour t recognized that, where t he accused led evidence about
his own di screditable conduct to explai n his actions, this ev idence could also
be used to judge hi s credibility as a witn ess.

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT