D.L. Pollock Professional Corporation v. Blicharz, 2018 ABCA 252
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Ronald Berger |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Case Date | July 17, 2018 |
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Citations | 2018 ABCA 252 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
JC v KC,
...courts provide an opportunity to be heard to those who will be affected by the decisions: DL Pollock Professional Corporation v Blicharz, 2018 ABCA 252 at para 12, citing A (LL) v B (A), 1995 CanLII 52 (SCC) at para 27, [1995] 4 SCR 536. As noted above, the question is whether the standard ......
-
Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 406
...para 67). This is subject to the exception where the outcome would have been inevitable (DL Pollock Professional Corporation v Blicharz, 2018 ABCA 252 at para 14; AB v Alberta (Persons with Developmental Disabilities Central Region), 2018 ABQB 181 at para 152). The same principles ought to ......
-
Santoro v Bank of Montreal, 2018 ABCA 264
...notwithstanding that there may be no prejudice to the party that was not heard: see D.L. Pollock Professional Corporation v Blicharz, 2018 ABCA 252 and cases cited therein. Whether this tenet of our legal system is operative in this case remains to be determined by a full panel of this Cour......
-
D.L. Pollock Professional Corporation v. Blicharz, 2018 ABCA 283
...from the applicant/cross-respondent and the respondent/cross-applicant following Reasons for Decision pronounced on July 17, 2018 (2018 ABCA 252). [2] The aforementioned submissions in letter form address the form and content of th......
4 cases
-
JC v KC,
...courts provide an opportunity to be heard to those who will be affected by the decisions: DL Pollock Professional Corporation v Blicharz, 2018 ABCA 252 at para 12, citing A (LL) v B (A), 1995 CanLII 52 (SCC) at para 27, [1995] 4 SCR 536. As noted above, the question is whether the standard ......
-
Kissel v Rocky View (County), 2020 ABQB 406
...para 67). This is subject to the exception where the outcome would have been inevitable (DL Pollock Professional Corporation v Blicharz, 2018 ABCA 252 at para 14; AB v Alberta (Persons with Developmental Disabilities Central Region), 2018 ABQB 181 at para 152). The same principles ought to ......
-
Santoro v Bank of Montreal, 2018 ABCA 264
...notwithstanding that there may be no prejudice to the party that was not heard: see D.L. Pollock Professional Corporation v Blicharz, 2018 ABCA 252 and cases cited therein. Whether this tenet of our legal system is operative in this case remains to be determined by a full panel of this Cour......
-
D.L. Pollock Professional Corporation v. Blicharz, 2018 ABCA 283
...from the applicant/cross-respondent and the respondent/cross-applicant following Reasons for Decision pronounced on July 17, 2018 (2018 ABCA 252). [2] The aforementioned submissions in letter form address the form and content of th......