Edgar v. British Columbia Institute of Technology et al., 2015 BCSC 710
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Russell, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | LIMITATION OF ACTIONS,TORTS,PRACTICE |
| Citation | 2015 BCSC 710,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 710,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 710 (SC) |
| Date | 01 May 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
Veeken v British Columbia,
...are bound to fail because of the expiration of the limitation period. They rely on Edgar v. The British Columbia Institute of Technology, 2015 BCSC 710 at para. 44, which says that an action that is clearly statute-barred by the expiration of a limitation period may be dismissed on an appli......
-
Anderson v. Double M Construction Ltd.,
...application under subrule (1) (a). [50] In Edgar v. British Columbia Institute of Technology, 2015 BCSC 710, Justice Russell held as [8] On an application to strike pleadings for disclosing no cause of action under Rule 9-5(1)(a), all the pleadings ......
-
2023 BCSC 943,
...are bound to fail because of the expiration of the limitation period. They rely on Edgar v. The British Columbia Institute of Technology, 2015 BCSC 710 at para. 44, which says that an action that is clearly statute-barred by the expiration of a limitation period may be dismissed on an appli......
-
Niemela v. Malamas et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1024
...Rule 9-6(5)(a) and (c) was recently summarized by Madam Justice Russell in Edgar v. The British Columbia Institute of Technology , 2015 BCSC 710 at para. 9: [9] On application for summary dismissal under Rule 9-6, evidence is not only admissible, but may be required. The analysis under Rule......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
-
Veeken v British Columbia,
...are bound to fail because of the expiration of the limitation period. They rely on Edgar v. The British Columbia Institute of Technology, 2015 BCSC 710 at para. 44, which says that an action that is clearly statute-barred by the expiration of a limitation period may be dismissed on an appli......
-
Anderson v. Double M Construction Ltd.,
...application under subrule (1) (a). [50] In Edgar v. British Columbia Institute of Technology, 2015 BCSC 710, Justice Russell held as [8] On an application to strike pleadings for disclosing no cause of action under Rule 9-5(1)(a), all the pleadings ......
-
2023 BCSC 943,
...are bound to fail because of the expiration of the limitation period. They rely on Edgar v. The British Columbia Institute of Technology, 2015 BCSC 710 at para. 44, which says that an action that is clearly statute-barred by the expiration of a limitation period may be dismissed on an appli......
-
Niemela v. Malamas et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1024
...Rule 9-6(5)(a) and (c) was recently summarized by Madam Justice Russell in Edgar v. The British Columbia Institute of Technology , 2015 BCSC 710 at para. 9: [9] On application for summary dismissal under Rule 9-6, evidence is not only admissible, but may be required. The analysis under Rule......
Request a trial to view additional results