Erven v. The Queen, [1979] 1 SCR 926

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeLaskin, Bora; Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Spence, Wishart Flett; Pigeon, Louis-Philippe; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; Pratte, Yves
Citation[1979] 1 SCR 926,33 Nfld & PEIR 89,25 NR 49,44 CCC (2d) 76,92 DLR (3d) 507,[1978] SCJ No 114 (QL),1978 CanLII 19 (SCC),49 APR 89,[1979] 1 SCR 521,6 CR (3d) 97,1978 CanLII 172 (SCC),30 NSR (2d) 89,[1978] CarswellNS 22
Date21 December 1978
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
212 practice notes
  • R. v. Darrach, 2000 SCC 46
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 12, 2000
    ...595; R. v. B. (K.G.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 740; R. v. S. (R.J.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 451; R. v. Jones, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 229; Erven v. The Queen, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 926; R. v. Hebert, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 151; R. v. Ewanchuk, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 330; R. v. Underwood, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 77; Dubois v. The Queen, [1985......
  • R. v. M.C.H., (1998) 230 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 24, 1998
    ...26 C.C.C.(3d) 17 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused [1986] 1 S.C.R. v; 68 N.R. 400; 18 O.A.C. 80, refd to. [paras. 9, 72]. R. v. Erven, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 926; 25 N.R. 49; 30 N.S.R.(2d) 89; 49 A.P.R. 89; 44 C.C.C.(2d) 76; 92 D.L.R.(3d) 507, refd to. [paras. 12, 100]. Ibrahim v. R., [1914] A.C. 59......
  • R. v. Wood (J.D.), (2001) 191 N.S.R.(2d) 201 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Nova Scotia Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • February 16, 2001
    ...trial itself have distinct functions. The function of the voir dire is to determine admissibility of evidence' ( Erven v. The Queen , [1979] 1 S.C.R. 926, at p. 931, 44 C.C.C.(2d) 76; 92 D.L.R.(3d) 507). If the evidence is found to be admissible under s. 276, it may then serve to satisfy th......
  • R. v. Sanche (W.), (2003) 347 A.R. 133 (PC)
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 5, 2003
    ...(A.J.), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 420; 252 N.R. 250; 145 Man.R.(2d) 201; 218 W.A.C. 201; 143 C.C.C.(3d) 31, refd to. [para. 49]. R. v. Erven, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 926; 25 N.R. 49; 30 N.S.R.(2d) 89; 49 A.P.R. 89, refd to. [para. R. v. M.C.H., [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; 230 N.R. 1; 113 O.A.C. 97; 127 C.C.C.(3d) 4......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
189 cases
  • R. v. Power (E.), (1994) 165 N.R. 241 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • April 14, 1994
    ...181, refd to. [para. 10]. Director of Public Prosecutions v. Humphrys, [1976] 2 All E.R. 497 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 10]. R. v. Erven, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 926; 25 N.R. 49; 30 N.S.R.(2d) 89; 49 A.P.R. 89; 44 C.C.C.(2d) 76, refd to. [para. 10]. R. v. Krannenburg, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 1053; 31 N.R. 206......
  • R v Haevischer,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • April 28, 2023
    ...Pretrial Services Centre, 2010 BCSC 805, 11 Admin. L.R. (5th) 1; R. v. Sadikov, 2014 ONCA 72, 305 C.C.C. (3d) 421; Erven v. The Queen, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 926; R. v. Kematch, 2010 MBCA 18, 251 Man. R. (2d) 191; R. v. Garnier, 2017 NSSC 239; R. v. Wilder, 2004 BCSC 304; R. v. Hamill (1984), 14 C......
  • R. v. Wilder (D.M.), [2002] B.C.T.C. 705 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 13, 2002
    ...; 122 C.C.C.(3d) 167 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 20]. R. v. Jackson (1898), 2 C.C.C. 149 (N.S.S.C.), refd to. [para. 40]. R. v. Erven, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 926; 25 N.R. 49 ; 30 N.S.R.(2d) 89 ; 49 A.P.R. 89 ; 44 C.C.C.(2d) 76 , refd to. [para. R. v. M.C.H., [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449 ; 230 N.R. 1 ......
  • R. v. Jack (B.G.), (1992) 76 Man.R.(2d) 168 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • November 1, 1991
    ...11 O.A.C. 391, refd to. [para. 167]. R. v. Wallen, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 827; 107 N.R. 50; 107 A.R. 114, refd to. [para. 169]. R. v. Erven, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 926; 25 N.R. 49; 30 N.S.R.(2d) 89; 49 A.P.R. 89, refd to. [para. Boucher v. R., [1955] S.C.R. 16, refd to. [para. 171]. R. v. Turvey (1969), ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 12 – 16, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 22, 2018
    ...ONCA 753, R v Park, [1981] 1 SCR 64, R v Hodgson, [1998] 2 SCR 449, R v Sweezey (1974), 20 CCC (2d) 400 (Ont CA), Erven v The Queen, [1979] 1 SCR 926, R v Richards, 2017 ONCA 424, R v Roberts, 2018 ONCA 411, R v Wills (1992), 70 CCC (3d) 529, R v Angelantoni (1975), 28 CCC (2d) 179 (Ont CA)......
13 books & journal articles
  • The confessions rule and the Charter.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 54 No. 3, September 2009
    • September 22, 2009
    ...Era" (2004) 48 Crim. L.Q. 249, 280 & 474. (22) Ibrahim v. R., [1914] A.C. 599 (P.C.) at 609-10 [Ibrahim]; Erven v. R. (1978), [1979] 1 S.C.R. 926 at 930-31, 30 N.S.R. (2d) (23) Hodgson, supra note 15. (24) The classic formulation of this branch of the rule is found in Ibrahim (supra not......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT