Index
| Author | David A. Potts |
| Profession | Barrister, Bar of Ontario |
| Pages | 499-515 |
499
Index
Absolute hyperlin ks,
Absolute privilege defence , ,
Abuse of process
motions of, , ,
UK Internet libel ac tions stayed as an,
–,
abuse of process case s, groups of,
–
cost vs. benet of result s achieved,
forum shopping, dism issed for,
–
limited publicat ions, dismissed
for,
purpose, improper, –
resources, disprop ortionate use
of,
success, litt le likelihood of,
dismissed for,
abuse of process in domest ic libel
actions, –
application of concept of, –
development of concept of,
general, –
jurisdict ion, rare exercise of,
motion, timing of t he,
not an abuse of process, –
damaged reputation, –
defamatory mater ial remains on
Internet,
defendant’s attitude, relev ance
of,
forum shopping, non-ex istent,
–
high proceedi ngs’ costs &/or use
of judicial resource s, –
incomplete evidence, –
multi-jurisdic tional claims,
similar a llegations by others,
principles, statement of, –,
–
Aggravated da mages,
Amoudi principle,
Anonymous authors, identi cation of, ,
–
balancing i nterests,
notice to author, obligation to give,
–
Canada, in, –
mandatory notice
reasons agains t, –
reasons for, –
the UK, in,
the US, in, –
Personal Information P rotection and
Electronic Docum ents Act (PIPEDA)
and, ,
privacy
limitations of pol icies, –
reasonable expect ation of Internet
users’, –
proceedings, du ring course of, –
applicable law, analysis of,
Charter of Right s and Freedoms and,
–,
500 Cyberlibel: Information Warfare in the st Century
disclosure request s vs. engage-
ment of values of, –
litigation process: r ights vs.
disclosure request , –
role of court when values of
engaged,
relevant principles vs. pre sent pro-
ceeding, –
proceedings, prior to c ommencing,
–
anonymity
ways to achieve,
ways to lose, –
author identity, process of obtai ning,
–
factors to consider, –
remedies, Canad a and UK, in, –
ascertai ning author names,
other means of, –
non-parties wit h leave
discoveries of, –
production of, –
Norwich Pharma cal Order,
–, –. See also No r-
wich Pharmacal O rder
Apologies, defamator y material, for, , ,
, , , , , , , , , ,
, , ,
damages, impl ications for, –
guidelines for,
Assets, cy berlibel vs. oine libel lit igation
and,
Assumed juris diction, –,
A.T. v. L.T.H., invasion of privacy and, ,
–,
conicting i nterests in, –
freedom of expression, –
right to privacy, –
rights and free doms, balancing,
–
Automatic hyperlin ks. See Hyperlinks,
automatic/embedded
Blogs,
Australia n legislation on, –
Canadian leg islation on, –
oine libel or defa mation laws vs.,
Boolean system, s earch engines and, –
Breach of condence, , –,
Broadcasting , ,
Browsers, , , , , –, – ,
, –,
Bulletin B osrds, , , , , , , ,
, , –, , , , ,
Bunt v. Tilley & Ors, intermed iary liability
in defamation act ions and, , ,
, , , , , , , , ,
–
Caching, , –, , –,
AOL, use of by, –
Canadian leg islation on,
UK legislation on, –
Canadian l ibel law, US libel law vs., –
Carpet bombing ,
Carriers,
Carter v. B.C. Federation of Foste r Parents,
Internet publications a nd, , , ,
–, , , , , –, , ,
–
Cause of action and defenc es
defamatory mea ning, forms of, –
basic forms of, –
inferential mea ning, –
legal innuendo,
literal mean ing,
context and mode of publicat ion,
–,
audiovisual def amation, –
plainti, reference to t he, –
general,
“of the plainti ” phrase, need for,
two-part test , –
publication and hype rlinks, –
Canadian law
no presumption of publication
on Internet, –
analysis of, –
statutory presumpt ions,
Crookes v. Newton, Interne t publica-
tion decisions prior to, –
Carter v. B.C. Federation of
Foster Parents, –
Crookes v. Pilling, –
Crookes v. Yahoo!, –
hyperli nks
automatic/embedded vs. user-
activated, –
Crookes v. Newton, –
To continue reading
Request your trial