Liedtke-Thompson v. Gignac, [2014] B.C.A.C. Uned. 1
| Judge | Levine, Neilson and Garson, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Yukon Territory) |
| Case Date | January 14, 2014 |
| Jurisdiction | Yukon |
| Citations | [2014] B.C.A.C. Uned. 1;2014 YKCA 2;[2014] B.C.A.C. Uned. 1 (YukCA) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
North America Construction (1993) Ltd. v. Yukon Energy Corporation, 2018 YKCA 6
...because they are aware of the central issues of the litigation, the rule in Browne v. Dunn is not engaged: see Liedtke-Thompson v. Gignac, 2014 YKCA 2 at paras. 42-43; R. v. Drydgen, 2013 BCCA 253 at para. 18; Trillium Motor World Ltd. v. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2017 ONCA 544 at ......
-
Xu v. Chu, 2018 BCSC 2222
...because they are aware of the central issues of the litigation, the rule in Browne v. Dunn is not engaged: see Liedtke-Thompson v. Gignac, 2014 YKCA 2 at paras. 42-43; R. v. Drydgen, 2013 BCCA 253 at para. 18; Trillium Motor World Ltd. v. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2017 ONCA 544 at ......
-
R v. S.C.D.Y., 2020 ABCA 134
...matters on which the complainant was not cross-examined will be clear even without cross-examination”) & Liedtke-Thompson v. Gignac, 2014 YKCA 2, ¶ 43 (“the respondent’s theory as to the cause of the appellant’s injuries was set out in his counterclaim and was put to her in examination ......
-
Hamman v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2020 BCCA 170
...Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2017 ONCA 544 at para. 317, leave to appeal ref’d (2018), [2017] S.C.C.A. No. 366; Liedtke‑Thompson v. Gignac, 2014 YKCA 2 at para. [79] The rule does not apply where it should be obvious that the cross‑examiner intends to impeach the witness’s testimony. In Brown......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
North America Construction (1993) Ltd. v. Yukon Energy Corporation, 2018 YKCA 6
...because they are aware of the central issues of the litigation, the rule in Browne v. Dunn is not engaged: see Liedtke-Thompson v. Gignac, 2014 YKCA 2 at paras. 42-43; R. v. Drydgen, 2013 BCCA 253 at para. 18; Trillium Motor World Ltd. v. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2017 ONCA 544 at ......
-
Xu v. Chu, 2018 BCSC 2222
...because they are aware of the central issues of the litigation, the rule in Browne v. Dunn is not engaged: see Liedtke-Thompson v. Gignac, 2014 YKCA 2 at paras. 42-43; R. v. Drydgen, 2013 BCCA 253 at para. 18; Trillium Motor World Ltd. v. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2017 ONCA 544 at ......
-
R v. S.C.D.Y., 2020 ABCA 134
...matters on which the complainant was not cross-examined will be clear even without cross-examination”) & Liedtke-Thompson v. Gignac, 2014 YKCA 2, ¶ 43 (“the respondent’s theory as to the cause of the appellant’s injuries was set out in his counterclaim and was put to her in examination ......
-
Hamman v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2020 BCCA 170
...Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2017 ONCA 544 at para. 317, leave to appeal ref’d (2018), [2017] S.C.C.A. No. 366; Liedtke‑Thompson v. Gignac, 2014 YKCA 2 at para. [79] The rule does not apply where it should be obvious that the cross‑examiner intends to impeach the witness’s testimony. In Brown......
Request a trial to view additional results