Loblaws Inc. v. Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 961 |
| Date | 22 July 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
Loblaws Inc. v. Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 1434
...[2] On July 22, 2019, I released both confidential and public versions of my decision (see Loblaws Inc v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961, for the Public Judgment and Reasons), dismissing both Loblaw’s claims and Pampered Chef’s counterclaim. As agreed by the parties, I reserved my d......
-
Cheung’s Bakery Products Ltd. v. Easywin Ltd.,
...300 [BBM] at para 34; Eclectic Edge Inc v Gildan Apparel (Canada) LP, 2015 FC 1332 at para 100; Loblaws Inc. v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961 at para 142, also citing BBM at para 34. (2) Profile of average Canadian consumer [53] With the foregoing principles in mind, I am persuaded......
-
Canadian Pacific Railway v. Canada, 2020 FC 690
...on the bounds of ‘responding’ expert evidence with one or two recent exceptions (see for instance, Loblaws v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961 [Loblaws], discussed below). Rather, the Federal Courts have produced more commentary on ‘reply’ expert evidence. [18] Procedure in the provin......
-
1196278 Ontario Inc DBA Sassafraz v. 815470 Ontario Ltd DBA Sassafras Coastal Kitchen & Bar, 2022 FC 116
...– rather than a mere possibility – of confusion, on a balance of probabilities: Loblaws Inc v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961 at para 44 [Loblaws], aff’d 2021 FCA 29; Toys “R” Us (Canada) Ltd v Herbs “R” Us Wellness Society, 2020 FC 6......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Loblaws Inc. v. Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 1434
...[2] On July 22, 2019, I released both confidential and public versions of my decision (see Loblaws Inc v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961, for the Public Judgment and Reasons), dismissing both Loblaw’s claims and Pampered Chef’s counterclaim. As agreed by the parties, I reserved my d......
-
Cheung’s Bakery Products Ltd. v. Easywin Ltd.,
...300 [BBM] at para 34; Eclectic Edge Inc v Gildan Apparel (Canada) LP, 2015 FC 1332 at para 100; Loblaws Inc. v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961 at para 142, also citing BBM at para 34. (2) Profile of average Canadian consumer [53] With the foregoing principles in mind, I am persuaded......
-
Canadian Pacific Railway v. Canada, 2020 FC 690
...on the bounds of ‘responding’ expert evidence with one or two recent exceptions (see for instance, Loblaws v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961 [Loblaws], discussed below). Rather, the Federal Courts have produced more commentary on ‘reply’ expert evidence. [18] Procedure in the provin......
-
1196278 Ontario Inc DBA Sassafraz v. 815470 Ontario Ltd DBA Sassafras Coastal Kitchen & Bar, 2022 FC 116
...– rather than a mere possibility – of confusion, on a balance of probabilities: Loblaws Inc v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961 at para 44 [Loblaws], aff’d 2021 FCA 29; Toys “R” Us (Canada) Ltd v Herbs “R” Us Wellness Society, 2020 FC 6......
5 firm's commentaries
-
PC v. PC: Smart & Biggar prevails in dismissal of appeal on behalf of Pampered Chef
...of Appeal issued its decision dismissing an appeal from the Federal Court’s trial decision in Loblaws Inc v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961. As previously reported, Pampered Chef, a Berkshire Hathaway company and a world leader in the sale of premium kitchenware products, successful......
-
PC v. PC. Pampered Chef Succeeds In Trademark Infringement Battle: Smart & Biggar Prevails At Trial On Behalf Of Pampered Chef
...July 22, 2019, the Federal Court issued its decision in Loblaws Inc v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961. Pampered Chef, a Berkshire Hathaway company and a world-leader in the sale of premium kitchenware products, has succeeded at trial in defending trademark infringement, passing off,......
-
PC V. PC: Pampered Chef Succeeds Once Again In Trademark Infringement Battle: Smart & Biggar Prevails In Dismissal By Federal Court Of Appeal
...of Appeal issued its decision dismissing an appeal from the Federal Court's trial decision in Loblaws Inc v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961. As previously reported, Pampered Chef, a Berkshire Hathaway company and a world leader in the sale of premium kitchenware products, successful......
-
PC v. PC. Pampered Chef Succeeds in Trademark Infringement Battle
...22, 2019, the Federal Court issued its decision in Loblaws Inc v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961. Pampered Chef, a Berkshire Hathaway company and a world-leader in the sale of premium kitchenware products, has succeeded at trial in defending trademark infringement, passing off, and ......
Request a trial to view additional results