M.D.L. v C.R., 2020 SKCA 44
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Whitmore, Schwann and Kalmakoff JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 44 |
| Date | 16 April 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACV3296 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...[2004] SJ No 326, 5 RFL (6th) 361 (QB).........................................................................15, 289, 291, 299 MDL v CR, 2020 SKCA 44........................................................... 269, 272, 278, 284, 304, 306, 321, 460, 644, 649 Meade v Meade, [2002] OJ No 315......
-
Form and Types of Order
...but see Cross v Batters, 2016 SKCA 71. 240 Lee v Lee, [1998] NJ No 247 (CA); Fedortchouk v Boubnoy, 2018 NSSC 66 at para 84; MDL v CR, 2020 SKCA 44 at paras 35–38; see also FM v TH, 2016 NBCA 241 Compare Hall v Hall, [1999] OJ No 453 (Gen Div) (global amount of interim spousal and child sup......
-
Child Support on or After Divorce
...in Canada, 2012 (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2012) at 286–87. 322 See FJN v JK, 2019 ABCA 305 at para 72; AM v GM, 2018 BCSC 942; MDL v CR, 2020 SKCA 44. As to ongoing judicial uncertainty and lack of consistency, see Simpson v Trowsdale, [2007] PEIJ No 7 (SCTD), MacDonald 323 Beruschi v Muller, 20......
-
Special or Extraordinary Expenses
...(SC); MacKinnon v MacKinnon, [2005] OJ No 1552 (CA); Titova v Titov, 2012 ONCA 864; Beisel v Henderson, [2004] SJ No 413 (QB); MDL v CR, 2020 SKCA 44. MA v FHA, 2011 BCSC 1047; KKS v JSS, 2019 BCSC 136; NSC v DC, 2011 NBQB 229; Bocaneala v Bocaneala, 2014 NSSC 450; Williams v Steinwand, 201......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
A.E v. A.E.,
...affordable to them, rather than the joint incomes of both parties (Matlock v. Matlock, 2010 SKQB 16 (Q.B.), at para, 12; M.D.L. v. C.R., 2020 SKCA 44 (C.A.), at para. 86). If the expense qualifies as extraordinary within the meaning of section 7(1.1)(a) there is no need to consi......
-
A.P. v J.P., 2020 SKCA 134
...279 Sask R 306; Phillips Legal Professional Corporation v Vo, 2017 SKCA 58 at para 150, [2017] 12 WWR 779; and M.D.L. v C.R., 2020 SKCA 44 at para 108. [53] It is well-established that a successful party in a family law p......
-
Duguid v Duguid, 2020 SKCA 118
...1415, 423 Sask R 35; Bromm v Bromm, 2010 SKCA 149 at paras 16–22, 91 RFL (6th) 268; M.D.L. v C.R., 2020 SKCA 44 at paras 41–43). The determination of whether such an order is interim or final requires consideration of a number of factors, as Jacks......
-
MARDANISAMANI v. FARSHAD,
...A recent summary of the legal principles in play can be found in M.D.L. v C.R., 2020 SKCA 44 [M.D.L.], as follows: 85 Section 7 of the Guidelines allows for the payment of special and extraordinary expenses of the sort listed in s. 7(1), having regard to the necessity of such exp......
5 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...[2004] SJ No 326, 5 RFL (6th) 361 (QB).........................................................................15, 289, 291, 299 MDL v CR, 2020 SKCA 44........................................................... 269, 272, 278, 284, 304, 306, 321, 460, 644, 649 Meade v Meade, [2002] OJ No 315......
-
Form and Types of Order
...but see Cross v Batters, 2016 SKCA 71. 240 Lee v Lee, [1998] NJ No 247 (CA); Fedortchouk v Boubnoy, 2018 NSSC 66 at para 84; MDL v CR, 2020 SKCA 44 at paras 35–38; see also FM v TH, 2016 NBCA 241 Compare Hall v Hall, [1999] OJ No 453 (Gen Div) (global amount of interim spousal and child sup......
-
Child Support on or After Divorce
...in Canada, 2012 (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2012) at 286–87. 322 See FJN v JK, 2019 ABCA 305 at para 72; AM v GM, 2018 BCSC 942; MDL v CR, 2020 SKCA 44. As to ongoing judicial uncertainty and lack of consistency, see Simpson v Trowsdale, [2007] PEIJ No 7 (SCTD), MacDonald 323 Beruschi v Muller, 20......
-
Special or Extraordinary Expenses
...(SC); MacKinnon v MacKinnon, [2005] OJ No 1552 (CA); Titova v Titov, 2012 ONCA 864; Beisel v Henderson, [2004] SJ No 413 (QB); MDL v CR, 2020 SKCA 44. MA v FHA, 2011 BCSC 1047; KKS v JSS, 2019 BCSC 136; NSC v DC, 2011 NBQB 229; Bocaneala v Bocaneala, 2014 NSSC 450; Williams v Steinwand, 201......
Request a trial to view additional results