McCormick v. Plambeck, 2020 BCSC 881

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Chief Justice Hinkson
Citation2020 BCSC 881
Docket NumberS148167
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date12 June 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
17 practice notes
  • Sidhu v. Hiebert, 2022 BCSC 1024
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 17 June 2022
    ...caused, in fact and in law, by the defendant's breach. [124]    As our Chief Justice noted in McCormick v. Plambeck, 2020 BCSC 881 at para. 175, and equally applies here, the plaintiff is asking this Court to extend the ambit of a duty of care previously recognized in ju......
  • Gustafson v. MacFarlane, 2022 BCSC 1872
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 26 October 2022
    ...award by comparison to the valuation of an in-trust award for the parents of a brain-injured adult child in McCormick v. Plambeck, 2020 BCSC 881 at paras. 354-368, aff’d 2022 BCCA 219.  Chief Justice Hinkson dismissed the plaintiff’s claim and assessed damages in the......
  • 2023 BCSC 167,
    • Canada
    • 1 January 2023
    ...defendants discloses reasonable foreseeability and sufficient proximity to establish a prima facie duty of care: McCormick v. Plambeck, 2020 BCSC 881 at para. 204. This stage of the test is directed at the specifics of the individual case and determines whether the relationship between the ......
  • Ilic v. British Columbia (Justice),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 6 February 2023
    ...defendants discloses reasonable foreseeability and sufficient proximity to establish a prima facie duty of care: McCormick v. Plambeck, 2020 BCSC 881 at para. 204. This stage of the test is directed at the specifics of the individual case and determines whether the relationship between the ......
  • Get Started for Free
11 cases
  • Sidhu v. Hiebert,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 17 June 2022
    ...caused, in fact and in law, by the defendant's breach. [124]    As our Chief Justice noted in McCormick v. Plambeck, 2020 BCSC 881 at para. 175, and equally applies here, the plaintiff is asking this Court to extend the ambit of a duty of care previously recognized in ju......
  • 2023 BCSC 167,
    • Canada
    • 1 January 2023
    ...defendants discloses reasonable foreseeability and sufficient proximity to establish a prima facie duty of care: McCormick v. Plambeck, 2020 BCSC 881 at para. 204. This stage of the test is directed at the specifics of the individual case and determines whether the relationship between the ......
  • Gustafson v. MacFarlane,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 26 October 2022
    ...award by comparison to the valuation of an in-trust award for the parents of a brain-injured adult child in McCormick v. Plambeck, 2020 BCSC 881 at paras. 354-368, aff’d 2022 BCCA 219.  Chief Justice Hinkson dismissed the plaintiff’s claim and assessed damages in the......
  • Uy v. Dhillon,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 2 September 2020
    ...al., 2002 BCSC 1104, aff’d 2004 BCCA 290; b) Van v. Howlett, 2014 BCSC 1404; c) Paur v. Providence Health Care; d) McCormick v. Plambeck, 2020 BCSC 881; and, e) MacEachern v. Rennie. [95] The defendants acknowledge that Mr. Uy has suffered a significant brain injury but they submit that he ......
  • Get Started for Free
5 firm's commentaries
1 books & journal articles
  • BENCHPRESS | Sentencing, Supervising and Schooling.
    • Canada
    • LawNow Vol. 44 No. 6, July 2020
    • 1 July 2020
    ...community in which he grew up. " The decision? The Court found 4 years was appropriate. Liability of Social Hosts McCormick v. Plambeck, 2020 BCSC 881 In September 2012, seventeen-year-old Calder McCormick attended a party on Salt Spring Island in B.C. Twin sisters hosted the party at their......