Minimum Maintenance Standards and the Municipal Act, 2001: Lessons Learned from Thornhill (Litigation Guardian of) v. Shadid

AuthorC. Kirk Boggs and Meredith E. Jones
Pages451-476

Minimum Maintenance Standards
andtheMunicipalAct
LessonsLearnedfromThornhill
(Litigation Guardian of) v. Shadid
C. Kirk Boggs and Meredith E. Jones*
A. INTRODUCTION
Giventhatoneoftheprima ryfunct ionsoflocalgovernmentist hecon-
structiona ndmaintenance ofstreets andhighwaysitis notsurpri sing
thataccidents occurri ngon municipal roadsprovide the largestsingle
source of claims against mun icipalitiesHowever unlike individual
citizens the powers duties and responsibilities of mun icipalities are
principally derived from statute and correspondingly in most Can-
adianjurisdictionsamunicipalitysdutytokeepitspublichighwaysand
bridgesinareasonablestateofrepairhasbeencodiedbystatute
Historicallythe legislature and the court shave made itclear t hat
amun icipalityi snot to betreatedas an in surerof the safet yof those
usingits highways andbridgesA municipalit ysobligationis to take
reasonableactiontokeepitshighwaysandbridgesinareasonablestate
ofrepair in the circumstancesincludingt hecharactera ndlocation of
 CKirkBoggsisapartnerintheInsuranceDefenceLitigationHealthLawandClass
Proceedingsprac ticegroupsatLerner sLLPandiscertiedbytheLawSociet yof
UpperCanadaasaSpecia listincivi llitigationMeredit hEJonesisanassoc iatein
theInsura nceDefenceLitigationa ndHealthLawpracticegroupatLer nersLLP
 DGBoghosianJMDavisonQCThe Law of Municipal Liability in Ca nadaloose-
leafMarkhamONBuerwort hsatBoghosianDavison
 Ibid.
 Thornhill (Litigation Guardian of ) v. ShadidOJNoatparaSCJ
Thornhill
CKBMEJ
thehighwayorbridgeAmunicipalityisnotandcannotbeexpectedto
makeallofitsroadspassableatalltimesandinallweatherconditions
Thatsaidwhatisconsideredreasonableactionandareasonablestate
ofrepair hasbeensubject toover acentur yof analysisa ndlitigation
As our roadsvehiclesa ndma intenance technology have evolvedso
hast hescope of a municipalitysduty of repairW hatwas reasonable
repairinthesorsmaynolongerbeviewedasadequatebyour
courtsWhiletheunderlyingprincipleshavelargelyremainedthesame
theirapplicationtospeci cfactsituationshas changedovertime asso-
cietyandthecour tshavesoughttoexpandgovernmentsresponsibility
forourdaytodaysafetyWhilenodoubtbenecialfromapublicsafety
standpoint this philosophical shi  from a more individual to a more
collectiveresponsibilityhasdramaticallyincreasedthena ncialburden
on municipalities as they aempt to meet the increased ex pectations
placedonthemThepressuretofundhigherlevelsofservicehasinevit-
ablycomeintoconict witht hecontinuous demandtodec reasetaxes
While a statutorily imposed duty of care is not subje ct to the policy
vsoperationaldecisionanalysisthereal ityisthatnumerousdecisions
withrespecttocompetingnancialprioritiesimpactonamunicipalitys
abilitytoprovideserviceImposingliabilityi nthefaceofthesecompet-
ingdemandscanbeafrust ratingexperienceforamunicipality
In Ontario the Municipal Act  imposesa duty on a munici-
palcorporationtokeepitsh ighwaysinareasonablestateofrepairThe
MunicipalActalsoimposescivilliabil ityonamunicipality whose
defaultin its duties results in damages to an individual Through an
analysis of section  of the Municipal Act  Ontario Regulation
 Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal HighwaysMMS
andt herecent decision in Thornhill (Litigation Guardian) v. Shadidthi s
paperwillexa minethe currentstate ofthelawi nOntariow ithrespect
to a municipalitysduty to keep its highways in a reasonable state of
rep ai r
 HDavidet aledsThomson Rogers on Municipal Lia bilityAuroraONCanadaLaw
Bookat
 SOcMunicipalAct
 Thornhill supranoteatparaGRustDEyeOBarMosheedsThe Ontario
MunicipalActAUsersManualTorontoThomsonCarswellat
 Thornhill ibid

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT