Minimum Standards
Author | Ari Kaplan, Mitch Frazer |
Pages | 194-303 |
194
CHAPTER 5
MINIMUM STANDARDS
This chapter describes the principal minimum pension standards that
aim to ensure that an employee who participates in a pension plan
will have a pension available at the conclusion of his or her working
life. Minimum standards arise under the Pension Be nefits Act1(the PBA)
and the Income Tax Act2 (theITA) and their respective regulations, as
expanded upon in regulatory policies and informed by other relevant
legislation and the common law. These standards a re first and foremost
employee protections and they can affect an employer’s and employees’
freedom to contractually design the provisions that form the content
of a pension plan.
A. MEMBERSHIP
1) Introduction
The pension standards discussed in this chapter are statutory rights
that arise as a result of an employee’s membership in a pension plan.
It might be said that in the case of pension plans, membership has its
rights, not privileges. The legal nature of being a plan “member” and
1 RSO 1990, c P.8 [PBA].
2 RSC 1985, c 1 (5th Supp), as amended [ITA]. The rules under the ITA a re not
minimum st andards per se, but rather, ta x standards: See Chapt er 3, Section
D(2).
Minimum Standards195
the benefits and obligations that flow therefrom, are well articulated as
follows:
A pension plan is not an a ssociation like a club, or a union. The word
“member” does not fairly describe the relationship. It is essentially a
contractual and commercial relationship . . . . The worker need not
have any voice in management of the plan, or selection of its man-
agers, or any of the attributes commonly associated with the word
membership in other contex ts. The plan could be, as such plans often
are, a private business venture. “Membership” is simply the word
chosen to describe the worker’s bundle of rights, derived either by
agreement or by trust law or by statute, against the managers.3
The focus of this chapter is principally on that “bundle of rights,” de-
rived from the PBA and other legal instruments that are conferred on
employees who participate as members of a pension plan.
2) Mandatory or Voluntary Membership
a) Term of contract of employment
A pension plan must set out the conditions for membership in the plan.4
In most jurisdictions, a plan sponsor may make membership voluntary
or mandatory.5 In Manitoba, where an employee falls into the class
of employees for which a pension plan was established, membership
is mandatory.6 Where participation in a pension plan is a compulsory
term of employment, some jurisdictions provide for statutory exemp-
tions where the employee objects to membership on religious grounds.7
3 Cicconi v Alberta (Superinte ndent of Pensions) (1991), 86 DLR (4th) 469 at 478 (Alta
CA), leave to appeal to SCC refu sed (1992), 92 DLR (4th) vi [Cicconi].
4 PBA, s 10(1)2.
5 See federal (PBSA, ss 14(1) & (2), and 15(4)); Albe rta (AEPPA, s 29(5)); Brit ish
Columbia (BCPBSA, s 25(6)); Quebec (QSPPA, s 34); and Saskatc hewan (SPBA,
s 24(2)). In Ontario, t he PBA is silent on this point , but see FSCO Policy M100-502
(March 2012) which provides th at mandatory membership m ay be a condition for
membership set out in t he plan text. As of the date of publ ication, new legislation
has been propo sed for Alberta and Briti sh Columbia, but not yet passed.
6 MPBA, ss 21(19)–(19.2). Membership is mandator y for full-time employees after
two years of employ ment, and for part-time employees, af ter having earned 35
percent of the Year’s Ma ximum Pensionable Earni ngs (YMPE) or having worked
at least a speci fied number of hours (which cannot exceed 700) for two conse cu-
tive calenda r years.
7 See federal (PBSA, s s 14(2) and 15(4)); Manitoba (MPBA, s 21(20)(b)). Manitoba
has addition al exemptions for employees who are fu ll-time students (MPBA,
s 21(20)(a)) and certain employees h ired before the later of 1 Januar y 1984 or
the commencement d ate of the plan (MPBA, ss 21(20)(c) & (d)).
PENSION LAW
196
It will be a breach of the Human Rights Code where employment is
denied or made conditional because a ter m or condition of employment
requires enrolment in a pension plan that makes a distinction, prefer-
ence, or exclusion on a prohibited ground of discrimination.8
b) Disclosure and enrolment by plan administrator
An employee eligible or required to join a pension plan has the right to
receive from the plan administrator a description of the provisions that
apply to the employee and an explanation of his or her rights and obli-
gations in respect of the plan.9 An employer is required to g ive the plan
administr ator all “ information necessary to enable the adm inistrator to
comply” with its membership disclosure obligations.10
Where an eligible employee is not advised of his or her right to
join the pension plan, one possible remedy, depending on the circum-
stances, is for the administrator to be required to admit the employee
retroactively.11
c) Voluntary termination of membership
Ordinarily, membership in a pension plan terminates when employ-
ment terminates. Some juri sdictions permit an employee to voluntarily
terminate membership in a plan where the plan is a multi-employer
pension plan (MEPP) or the employee works part-time or has been
laid-off from employment, and contributions have not been made to
the plan on the employee’s behalf for up to twenty-four months.12 In
8 Human Rights Code, RSO 1990, c H.19, s 25(1) [OHRC]. Section 5 of t he OHRC
provides th at every person has a right t o equal treatment wit h respect to
employment wit hout discrimination b ecause of race, ancestr y, place of ori gin,
colour, ethnic origi n, citizenship, creed, se x, sexual orientation, gen der identity,
gender expres sion, age, record of offences, marita l status, same-sex pa rtnership
status, family status, or disability.
9 PBA, ss 25(1) & (2). See als o federal (PBSA, s 28(1)(a)); Alberta (AEPPA, s 15(1)(a));
British Columbi a (BCPBSA, s 10(1)); Manitoba (MPBA, s 29); New Bruns wick
(NBPBA, s 23); Newfoundland and L abrador (NLPBA, ss 25(1) and (3)); Nova
Scotia (NSPBA, s 31); Quebec (QSPPA, s 111); Saskatchewan (SPBA, s 13(1)(a)).
10PBA, s 25(3).
11Re Amalgamated Transit Union, Lo cal 1182 and Super intendent of Pensions a nd
City of Saint John and City of Saint John Pension Bo ard, [2003] NBLE BD No 39;
Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1290 v New Br unswick (Superintendent of Pen-
sions), [2004] NBLE BD No 2; and Re Tru stees of the St Boniface Hospital/Union’s
Jointly Trusteed Pension Plan (Decis ion of the Pension Commission of Man itoba
dated 16 September 1997, written dec ision 8 December 1997).
12Ontario (PBA, s 3 8); Nova Scoti a (NSPBA, s 44(1)). In federal (PBSA, s 2(2)), thi s
is limited to c ertain circumst ances where the plan is a MEPP.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
