Osoyoos v. Rattlesnake Canyon, 2005 BCSC 307

JudgeBrooke, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateSeptember 01, 2004
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2005 BCSC 307;[2005] B.C.T.C. 307 (SC)

Osoyoos v. Rattlesnake Canyon, [2005] B.C.T.C. 307 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2005] B.C.T.C. TBEd. AP.013

Town of Osoyoos (plaintiff) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc. (defendant)

(S65427; 2005 BCSC 307)

Indexed As: Osoyoos (Town) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc.

British Columbia Supreme Court

Kelowna

Brooke, J.

March 4, 2005.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Civil Rights - Topic 3107

Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - General principles and definitions - Void for vagueness doctrine - See paragraphs 19 to 26.

Civil Rights - Topic 3107.2

Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - General principles and definitions - Overbreadth principle - See paragraphs 27 to 28.

Injunctions - Topic 7079

Particular matters - Violation of statute - Municipal bylaw - See paragraphs 30 to 31.

Municipal Law - Topic 3767

Bylaws - Particular bylaws (incl. scope of) - Noise control bylaw - See paragraphs 19 to 28.

Cases Noticed:

Coquitlam (City) v. Vivanco (1993), 17 M.P.L.R.(2d) 211 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 20].

R. v. Harvey (1988), 39 M.P.L.R. 44 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 20].

Dhillan v. Richmond (Municipality) (1987), 16 B.C.L.R.(2d) 80 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 20].

R. v. Heywood (R.L.), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 761; 174 N.R. 81; 50 B.C.A.C. 161; 82 W.A.C. 161, consd. [para. 22].

R. v. IHI Holdings Ltd., [1999] B.C.J. No. 2630 (Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 22].

Federated Anti-Poverty Groups of B.C. et al. v. Vancouver (City) et al., [2002] B.C.T.C. 105; 2002 BCSC 105, refd to. [para. 25].

Coquitlam (City) v. HOC Hyperbaric Care Centre Inc. et al. (1999), 3 B.C.T.C. 76 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 31].

Nelson (City) v. Krantz, [1999] B.C.J. No. 193 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 31].

Counsel:

B.S. Williamson, for the plaintiff;

J.P. Young, for the defendant.

This application was heard on September 1, 2004, before Brooke, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on March 4, 2005.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • Sources of Authority: Federal-Level Powers and the Constitution Acts
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Land-use Planning
    • June 23, 2017
    ...This will, as in Bedford , have implications for possible local land-use regulation as to places where the right may be exercised. 304 2005 BCSC 307. 305 2014 ONSC 2934. 306 2011 SCC 44 [ Insite ]. 307 SC 1996, c 19. 308 The case is also relevant to issues of paramountcy, interjurisdictiona......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Land-use Planning
    • June 23, 2017
    ...23 DLR (3d) 401, [1971] OJ No 1806 (CA) .................. 382−83, 597 Osoyoos (Town) v Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc, 2005 BCSC 307 ............................................................................................ 222 Osoyoos Indian Band v Oliver (Town), 2001 ......
  • Sunshine Coast (Regional District) v. Sheppard et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. G78
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 6, 2007
    ...will have been unnecessarily limited. [37] The defendants rely on Osoyoos (Town) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc., 2005 BCSC 307, where a noise bylaw was found to be so arbitrary or disproportionate that it met the test for uncertainty articulated in Heywood. In coming t......
  • Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford, [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. B20
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 31, 2007
    ...131, [2002] 8 W.W.R. 51, aff'd 2004 SCC 19, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 485; Osoyoos (Town) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc. , 2005 BCSC 307, 39 B.C.L.R. (4th) 359; R. v. IHI Holdings Ltd. , [1999] B.C.J. No. 2630 (QL) (B.C. Prov. Ct.) (" R. v. IHI Holdings Ltd. "); and R. v. Weltzi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Sunshine Coast (Regional District) v. Sheppard et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. G78
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 6, 2007
    ...will have been unnecessarily limited. [37] The defendants rely on Osoyoos (Town) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc., 2005 BCSC 307, where a noise bylaw was found to be so arbitrary or disproportionate that it met the test for uncertainty articulated in Heywood. In coming t......
  • Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford, [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. B20
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 31, 2007
    ...131, [2002] 8 W.W.R. 51, aff'd 2004 SCC 19, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 485; Osoyoos (Town) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc. , 2005 BCSC 307, 39 B.C.L.R. (4th) 359; R. v. IHI Holdings Ltd. , [1999] B.C.J. No. 2630 (QL) (B.C. Prov. Ct.) (" R. v. IHI Holdings Ltd. "); and R. v. Weltzi......
  • Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford, [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 630 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 28, 2008
    ...to be broader than necessary, "arbitrary or disproportionate": see Osoyoos (Town) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc. , 2005 BCSC 307, [2005] B.C.J. No. 494. That case was relied on by the respondents in their unsuccessful s. 7 challenge before Mr. Justice Romilly. While th......
2 books & journal articles
  • Sources of Authority: Federal-Level Powers and the Constitution Acts
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Land-use Planning
    • June 23, 2017
    ...This will, as in Bedford , have implications for possible local land-use regulation as to places where the right may be exercised. 304 2005 BCSC 307. 305 2014 ONSC 2934. 306 2011 SCC 44 [ Insite ]. 307 SC 1996, c 19. 308 The case is also relevant to issues of paramountcy, interjurisdictiona......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Land-use Planning
    • June 23, 2017
    ...23 DLR (3d) 401, [1971] OJ No 1806 (CA) .................. 382−83, 597 Osoyoos (Town) v Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc, 2005 BCSC 307 ............................................................................................ 222 Osoyoos Indian Band v Oliver (Town), 2001 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT