Osoyoos v. Rattlesnake Canyon, 2005 BCSC 307
Judge | Brooke, J. |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Case Date | September 01, 2004 |
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Citations | 2005 BCSC 307;[2005] B.C.T.C. 307 (SC) |
Osoyoos v. Rattlesnake Canyon, [2005] B.C.T.C. 307 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2005] B.C.T.C. TBEd. AP.013
Town of Osoyoos (plaintiff) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc. (defendant)
(S65427; 2005 BCSC 307)
Indexed As: Osoyoos (Town) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc.
British Columbia Supreme Court
Kelowna
Brooke, J.
March 4, 2005.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Civil Rights - Topic 3107
Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - General principles and definitions - Void for vagueness doctrine - See paragraphs 19 to 26.
Civil Rights - Topic 3107.2
Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - General principles and definitions - Overbreadth principle - See paragraphs 27 to 28.
Injunctions - Topic 7079
Particular matters - Violation of statute - Municipal bylaw - See paragraphs 30 to 31.
Municipal Law - Topic 3767
Bylaws - Particular bylaws (incl. scope of) - Noise control bylaw - See paragraphs 19 to 28.
Cases Noticed:
Coquitlam (City) v. Vivanco (1993), 17 M.P.L.R.(2d) 211 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 20].
R. v. Harvey (1988), 39 M.P.L.R. 44 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 20].
Dhillan v. Richmond (Municipality) (1987), 16 B.C.L.R.(2d) 80 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 20].
R. v. Heywood (R.L.), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 761; 174 N.R. 81; 50 B.C.A.C. 161; 82 W.A.C. 161, consd. [para. 22].
R. v. IHI Holdings Ltd., [1999] B.C.J. No. 2630 (Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 22].
Federated Anti-Poverty Groups of B.C. et al. v. Vancouver (City) et al., [2002] B.C.T.C. 105; 2002 BCSC 105, refd to. [para. 25].
Coquitlam (City) v. HOC Hyperbaric Care Centre Inc. et al. (1999), 3 B.C.T.C. 76 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 31].
Nelson (City) v. Krantz, [1999] B.C.J. No. 193 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 31].
Counsel:
B.S. Williamson, for the plaintiff;
J.P. Young, for the defendant.
This application was heard on September 1, 2004, before Brooke, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on March 4, 2005.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sources of Authority: Federal-Level Powers and the Constitution Acts
...This will, as in Bedford , have implications for possible local land-use regulation as to places where the right may be exercised. 304 2005 BCSC 307. 305 2014 ONSC 2934. 306 2011 SCC 44 [ Insite ]. 307 SC 1996, c 19. 308 The case is also relevant to issues of paramountcy, interjurisdictiona......
-
Table of cases
...23 DLR (3d) 401, [1971] OJ No 1806 (CA) .................. 382−83, 597 Osoyoos (Town) v Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc, 2005 BCSC 307 ............................................................................................ 222 Osoyoos Indian Band v Oliver (Town), 2001 ......
-
Sunshine Coast (Regional District) v. Sheppard et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. G78
...will have been unnecessarily limited. [37] The defendants rely on Osoyoos (Town) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc., 2005 BCSC 307, where a noise bylaw was found to be so arbitrary or disproportionate that it met the test for uncertainty articulated in Heywood. In coming t......
-
Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford, [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. B20
...131, [2002] 8 W.W.R. 51, aff'd 2004 SCC 19, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 485; Osoyoos (Town) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc. , 2005 BCSC 307, 39 B.C.L.R. (4th) 359; R. v. IHI Holdings Ltd. , [1999] B.C.J. No. 2630 (QL) (B.C. Prov. Ct.) (" R. v. IHI Holdings Ltd. "); and R. v. Weltzi......
-
Sunshine Coast (Regional District) v. Sheppard et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. G78
...will have been unnecessarily limited. [37] The defendants rely on Osoyoos (Town) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc., 2005 BCSC 307, where a noise bylaw was found to be so arbitrary or disproportionate that it met the test for uncertainty articulated in Heywood. In coming t......
-
Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford, [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. B20
...131, [2002] 8 W.W.R. 51, aff'd 2004 SCC 19, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 485; Osoyoos (Town) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc. , 2005 BCSC 307, 39 B.C.L.R. (4th) 359; R. v. IHI Holdings Ltd. , [1999] B.C.J. No. 2630 (QL) (B.C. Prov. Ct.) (" R. v. IHI Holdings Ltd. "); and R. v. Weltzi......
-
Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford, [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 630 (SC)
...to be broader than necessary, "arbitrary or disproportionate": see Osoyoos (Town) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc. , 2005 BCSC 307, [2005] B.C.J. No. 494. That case was relied on by the respondents in their unsuccessful s. 7 challenge before Mr. Justice Romilly. While th......
-
Sources of Authority: Federal-Level Powers and the Constitution Acts
...This will, as in Bedford , have implications for possible local land-use regulation as to places where the right may be exercised. 304 2005 BCSC 307. 305 2014 ONSC 2934. 306 2011 SCC 44 [ Insite ]. 307 SC 1996, c 19. 308 The case is also relevant to issues of paramountcy, interjurisdictiona......
-
Table of cases
...23 DLR (3d) 401, [1971] OJ No 1806 (CA) .................. 382−83, 597 Osoyoos (Town) v Rattlesnake Canyon Family Entertainment Park Inc, 2005 BCSC 307 ............................................................................................ 222 Osoyoos Indian Band v Oliver (Town), 2001 ......