PRIME v. PRIME, 2020 SKQB 326
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | MEGAW J. |
| Citation | 2020 SKQB 326 |
| Docket Number | DIV 296 of 2018 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 08 December 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 practice notes
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...MacGyver v Richards, (1995), 22 OR (3d) 481 at paras 27–29 (CA). 226 RJ v PJ, 2021 NBCA 28; CDMZ v REH-Z, 2013 NSSC 242; Prime v Prime, 2020 SKQB 326. 227 RJ v PJ, 2021 NBCA 28, Baird 228 See Zak v Zak, 2021 ABCA 131 (stay of interim parenting order); AM v GM, 2018 BCSC 942 applying section......
-
K.G.K. v L.T.K.,
...this is contrary to established authority as set out in J.P. and Russell, and in the recent decision of Megaw J. in Prime v Prime, 2020 SKQB 326 at para 49. [113] The proper approach required the Chambers judge to consider what the parenting arrangement, including where the children should ......
-
Friesen v Friesen,
...no issues of credibility. He began his assessment by indicating that he would utilize the manner of analysis set out in Prime v Prime, 2020 SKQB 326 [ Prime]. Prime directed trial judges to first determine what parenting arrangements were in the best interests of the child and only once tha......
-
M.A.B. v. M.G.C.,
...the best interests analysis, the court should not apply a standard of perfection to parents. As Megaw J. stated in Prime v. Prime, 2020 SKQB 326 (Q.B.), at para. 59: I am mindful the determination of the best interests of the children is not based on a picture of perfect parenting by ......
Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
-
K.G.K. v L.T.K.,
...this is contrary to established authority as set out in J.P. and Russell, and in the recent decision of Megaw J. in Prime v Prime, 2020 SKQB 326 at para 49. [113] The proper approach required the Chambers judge to consider what the parenting arrangement, including where the children should ......
-
Friesen v Friesen,
...no issues of credibility. He began his assessment by indicating that he would utilize the manner of analysis set out in Prime v Prime, 2020 SKQB 326 [ Prime]. Prime directed trial judges to first determine what parenting arrangements were in the best interests of the child and only once tha......
-
M.A.B. v. M.G.C.,
...the best interests analysis, the court should not apply a standard of perfection to parents. As Megaw J. stated in Prime v. Prime, 2020 SKQB 326 (Q.B.), at para. 59: I am mindful the determination of the best interests of the children is not based on a picture of perfect parenting by ......
-
Chapman v Somerville,
...so, the trial judge stated the following regarding the planned structure of her analysis: [20] As noted by Megaw J. in Prime v Prime, 2020 SKQB 326 at para 49, “Before addressing the issue of the children’s mobility, I must first determine what the appropriate parenting r......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...MacGyver v Richards, (1995), 22 OR (3d) 481 at paras 27–29 (CA). 226 RJ v PJ, 2021 NBCA 28; CDMZ v REH-Z, 2013 NSSC 242; Prime v Prime, 2020 SKQB 326. 227 RJ v PJ, 2021 NBCA 28, Baird 228 See Zak v Zak, 2021 ABCA 131 (stay of interim parenting order); AM v GM, 2018 BCSC 942 applying section......