R. v. Ehaloak, 2017 NUCA 4
| Jurisdiction | Nunavut |
| Judge | Grist |
| Citation | 2017 NUCA 4 |
| Docket Number | 21-17-115-CAS |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW |
| Court | Nunavut Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Date | 20 June 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R. v. Nahanee, 2022 SCC 37
...Council, [1988] 3 All E.R. 737; R. v. Delchev, 2015 ONCA 381, 126 O.R. (3d) 267; R. v. Burback, 2012 ABCA 30, 522 A.R. 352; R. v. Ehaloak, 2017 NUCA 4; R. v. Parranto, 2021 SCC 46; R. v. M. (C.A.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500; R. v. Walker, 2019 ONCA 765, 381 C.C.C. (3d) 259; Cardinal v. Director o......
-
R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2
...is strongly discouraged, when this does occur, the question for the appellate court is whether the sentence imposed is unfit: R v Ehaloak, 2017 NUCA 4, paras 34-39. However, the accused must be given fair notice of the case he has to meet. While Mr Parr was aware of the Crown’s position on ......
-
R v Sidhu,
...suggests to the contrary, although the overall range of sentence suggested by counsel was similar”) & The Queen v. Ehaloak, 2017 NUCA 4, ¶ 12 (“The submissions on sentence did not amount to a joint submission but the ranges presented were reasonably similar. The Crown......
-
R v Kritaqliluk,
...29-36; R v Kuliktana, 2020 NUCA 7, paras 86, 104-105, 107, 390 CCC (3d) 550; R v Kippomee, 2019 NUCA 3, para 30. [17] In R v Ehaloak, 2017 NUCA 4, paras 33, 36-37, this Court said the process to be followed in such a near joint submission was essentially the same as the process outlined in ......
4 cases
-
R. v. Nahanee, 2022 SCC 37
...Council, [1988] 3 All E.R. 737; R. v. Delchev, 2015 ONCA 381, 126 O.R. (3d) 267; R. v. Burback, 2012 ABCA 30, 522 A.R. 352; R. v. Ehaloak, 2017 NUCA 4; R. v. Parranto, 2021 SCC 46; R. v. M. (C.A.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500; R. v. Walker, 2019 ONCA 765, 381 C.C.C. (3d) 259; Cardinal v. Director o......
-
R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2
...is strongly discouraged, when this does occur, the question for the appellate court is whether the sentence imposed is unfit: R v Ehaloak, 2017 NUCA 4, paras 34-39. However, the accused must be given fair notice of the case he has to meet. While Mr Parr was aware of the Crown’s position on ......
-
R v Sidhu,
...suggests to the contrary, although the overall range of sentence suggested by counsel was similar”) & The Queen v. Ehaloak, 2017 NUCA 4, ¶ 12 (“The submissions on sentence did not amount to a joint submission but the ranges presented were reasonably similar. The Crown......
-
R v Kritaqliluk,
...29-36; R v Kuliktana, 2020 NUCA 7, paras 86, 104-105, 107, 390 CCC (3d) 550; R v Kippomee, 2019 NUCA 3, para 30. [17] In R v Ehaloak, 2017 NUCA 4, paras 33, 36-37, this Court said the process to be followed in such a near joint submission was essentially the same as the process outlined in ......