R. v. Gamble

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeDickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire
Citation[1988] 2 SCR 595,89 NR 161,1988 CanLII 15 (SCC),37 CRR 1,31 OAC 81,66 CR (3d) 193,45 CCC (3d) 204
Date08 December 1988
Docket Number20433

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
249 practice notes
  • R. v. DeSousa
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 13, 1991
    ...N.R. 81; 78 N.S.R.(2d) 183; 193 A.P.R. 183; 33 C.C.C.(3d) 289; 57 C.R.(3d) 289; 39 D.L.R.(4th) 481, refd to. [para. 17]. Gamble v. R., [1988] 2 S.C.R. 595; 89 N.R. 161; 31 O.A.C. 81; 66 C.R.(3d) 193; 45 C.C.C.(3d) 204, refd to. [para. 17]. R. v. Gamble - see Gamble v. R. Metropolitan Stores......
  • May v. Ferndale Institution
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 22, 2005
    ...v. The Queen, [1966] S.C.R. 356; Karchesky v. The Queen, [1967] S.C.R. 547; Korponay v. Kulik, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 265; R. v. Gamble, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 595; Reza v. Canada, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 394; Steele v. Mountain Institution, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1385; Idziak v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [1992] 3 ......
  • Idziak v. Canada (Minister of Justice)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 19, 1992
    ...application for leave - See paragraphs 17 to 19. Cases Noticed: Isbell, Re, [1930] S.C.R. 62, consd. [paras. 10, 28]. R. v. Gamble, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 595; 89 N.R. 161; 31 O.A.C. 81; 45 C.C.C.(3d) 204; 66 C.R.(3d) 193, appld. [paras. 10, 25]. Argentina v. Mellino, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 536; 76 N.R. ......
  • R. v. Conway (P.)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 11, 2010
    ...refd to. [para. 4]. R. v. Rahey, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 588; 75 N.R. 81; 78 N.S.R.(2d) 183; 193 A.P.R. 183, refd to. [para. 4]. Gamble v. R., [1988] 2 S.C.R. 595; 89 N.R. 161; 31 O.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. R. v. Smith (M.H.), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1120; 102 N.R. 205; 63 Man.R.(2d) 81, refd to. [para. 4]......
  • Get Started for Free
235 cases
  • R. v. Taillefer; R. v. Duguay
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 12, 2003
    ...Osborne v. Canada (Treasury Board), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 69; R. v. 974649 Ontario Inc., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 575, 2001 SCC 81; R. v. Gamble, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 595; Mills v. The Queen, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 863; R. v. Rahey, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 588; Doucet-Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education), [2003] 3......
  • Geary v. Edmonton Remand Centre (Director) et al., (2004) 350 A.R. 143 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 9, 2004
    ...459; 72 N.R. 61; 3 Q.A.C. 133, refd to. [para. 5]. Dumas v. LeClerc Institute - see Dumas v. National Parole Board. Gamble v. R., [1988] 2 S.C.R. 595; 89 N.R. 161; 31 O.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. Bembenek v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (1991), 69 C.C.C.(3d) 34 (Ont. Gen. Div.), re......
  • R. v. Raponi (W.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 23, 2006
    ...a generous and expansive interpretive approach holds equally true for Charter remedies as for Charter rights ( Gamble v. The Queen , [1988] 2 S.C.R. 595; R. v. Sarson , [1996] 2 S.C.R. 223; R. v. 974649 Ontario Inc. , [2001] 3 S.C.R. 575; 2001 SCC 81 (' Dunedin ')). In Dunedin , McLachlin, ......
  • Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Chhina
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 10, 2019
    ...(1989), 69 O.R. (2d) 253; considered: May v. Ferndale Institution, 2005 SCC 82, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809; referred to: R. v. Gamble, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 595; Mission Institution v. Khela, 2014 SCC 24, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 502; R. v. Khela, 2009 SCC 4, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 104; R. v. Miller, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 61......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 17, 2023 ' April 21, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 5, 2023
    ...2005 SCC 82, Mission Institution v. Khela, 2014 SCC 24, R. v. Graham, 2011 ONCA 138, R. v. Sarson, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 223, R. v. Gamble, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 595, R. v. Bird, 2019 SCC 7, Chaudhary v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety & Emergency Preparedness), 2015 ONCA 700, R. v. Zundel, 2003 CanL......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 4 – 8, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 15, 2019
    ...May v. Ferndale Institution, 2005 SCC 82, Mission Institution v. Khela, 2014 SCC 24, R. v. Lyons, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 309, R. v. Gamble, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 595, R. v. Sarson, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 223, R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27 Facts: The appellant was imprisoned as a dangerous offender for more than 30......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 1 - 5, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 9, 2018
    ...Institution, 2005 SCC 82, Chaudhary v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2015 ONCA 700, R. v. Gamble, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 595 Inspektor v. Solmon, 2018 ONCA 796 Keywords: Solicitor and Client, Professional Negligence, Settlements RJM56 Holdings Inc. v. Michel Bazine......
26 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Statutory Interpretation. Second Edition
    • August 31, 2007
    ...S.C.J. No. 42 ................................................................................................. 185 R. v. Gamble, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 595, 45 C.C.C. (3d) 204, [1988] S.C.J. No. 87 ...........................................................................................262– 63 ......
  • Appendices
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Understanding Charter Damages. The Judicial Evolution of a Charter Remedy
    • June 23, 2016
    ...Decisions 1984–94 R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd , [1985] 1 SCR 295. R v Mills , [1986] 1 SCR 863. R v Rahey , [1987] 1 SCR 588. R v Gamble , [1988] 2 SCR 595. Nelles v Ontario , [1989] 2 SCR 170. McKinney v University of Guelph , [1990] 3 SCR 229. Schachter v Canada , [1992] 2 SCR 679. R v Potvin......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Charter Remedies in Criminal Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2022
    ...194, 210-13 Gager, R v, 2012 ONSC 2697 ................................................. 67 Gamble, R v, [1988] 2 SCR 595, 1988 CanLII 15 ............................. . 179, 186 Garcia, R v, 2005 CanLII 4831, 194 CCC (3d) 361 (Ont CA) ................ 152, 164, 170 Garcia-Machado, R v, 201......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Fundamental Justice. Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
    • September 8, 2012
    ...258 R v G(B), [1999] 2 SCR 475, 174 DLR (4th) 301, [1999] SCJ No 29 ................... 213 R v Gamble, [1988] 2 SCR 595, 45 CCC (3d) 204, [1988] SCJ No 87 ................. 73 R v Gardiner, [1982] 2 SCR 368, 140 DLR (3d) 612, [1982] SCJ No 71 ............ 218 R v GDB, 2000 SCC 22 ...............
  • Get Started for Free